Manhattan Diary


All you need is love, isn’t it? As long as it reaches the Catholic Church’s approval

Posted on Saturday, February 02, 2013 at 09:17 AM

RSS


Recent Posts

Archives

submit to reddit

Archbishop of Westminster Vincent Nichols (David Rose)


Love, real and enduring love, is exceptionally hard to find. It’s a miraculous flowering that happens in this otherwise coldly indifferent world.

It’s what we live for, love. It’s what creates many of us, it’s what ultimately defines us and it’s certain it’s all that remains of us.

For one reason and another, I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about love. Decades of my time, actually, contemplating it. The fate of love, in particular, has always fascinated me above anything else.

Let’s face it -- most of life is like a visit to a dentist’s office. There are the impersonal stares of all the strangers around us, the receptionist’s interest in making sure we pay, and there’s the internal battle to remain positive faced with the faint dread of what could happen. This is how most of us live.

Given that it is, it’s no wonder we spend so much time in pursuit of a deeper connection.

Not everyone shares my enthusiasm about love, I realize. This week I read that the archbishop of Westminster, Vincent Nichols, announced that if employees want to keep their jobs as teachers in Catholic schools in Britain, they should not marry divorcees, or get married in registry offices, or enter into any other kind of legal civil ceremonies (such as civil partnerships) that do not meet with the Catholic Church’s approval.

Apart from its bracing fundamentalism, that directive is remarkable for its cruelty. Does the archbishop actually believe there is such a surfeit of love in this world that we can cheerfully prescribe how we encounter it?

This stark directive from the archbishop takes aim at both heterosexuals and homosexuals and tells them bluntly that falling for a divorcee or marrying in a borough hall or signing a civil union will not only be disapproved of, it will now get them fired.

A spokesman for the archbishop told the Sunday Times, “The expectation is that school leaders and those who aspire to leadership positions will make substantive life choices that are in conformity with the gospel and the teaching of the Catholic Church.”

Well that’s tidy, isn’t it? Just conform to the church’s increasingly rigid interpretation of the gospel and make the life choice to say goodbye to the person you happen to love.

It’s what Jesus would ask of you, we feel certain. Who could possibly object to that? 

I object, but I know there are a lot of people who feel differently. There are many people who put fidelity to an idea, or faith in a theology, over the untidy realities of our daily lives.

They prefer biting rules to wiggle room. They reject what the poet Michal Longley calls the drunkenness of things being various in favor of the sobriety of a command.

These people fascinate me. In particular their search for clarity, their search for order, at the expense of the complicating insights of their head and heart, at the expense of human experience itself, fascinate me.

All my life I have watched the myriad ways in which otherwise principled people end up saying no to life. Saying no, that is, to the very thing that will save them.

Because their salvation came at the wrong time, or because the person that offered it was the wrong race, or they had the wrong social or religious background, or the wrong gender, or they once said the wrong thing.

Saying no to life, saying no to love, is no small thing. It takes very considerable effort.

It is an exceptionally hard bargain that many people make in anticipation of a later reward (perhaps as late as after life). Once you’ve done it, once you’ve said no to life, which is also saying no to love, both life and love tend to say no right back to you. Often till the end of your days.

This is inevitable, because, as I said, there is so very little love in the world to begin with.

I’ve watched it happen. I have seen people around me possessed by an idea at the expense of own their head and heart.

They will exchange what they think and feel for something they have been told and then tell others. Believing they can do no harm, because they stand for good, they can make loveless wastelands of their own lives.

And here’s one of the things I have learned from watching them -- the hallmark of freedom is generosity, just as the hallmark of love is kindness.

If you can’t find either in the way you’re living or in the way that someone is asking you to live, that’s your first clue you’re going in the wrong direction.

See more: Irish Voice


51 Comments

15 - 51 | See all comments

I cannot see what business the Church has in civil matters regarding legal affairs , unless it infringes on clerical, ecclesiastical or society issues . However all Churches have a responsibility to Society, in administering and protecting the Spiritual welfare of its congregations. Birth ,Marriage and death etc are of high importance to life and the Government’s duty is protection . The Churches responsibility is our Spiritual welfare. All of this is under threat by undermining the Churches teachings on Spiritual principles. The Government also has similar regarding its administration of law and order. Both Church and State cannot leave themselves in a position of vulnerability, by allowing their core values submit to minority/ majority self-aspirations. The government can operate on this by its Democratic process. The Church cant, even though many changes have taken place. They cannot do much regarding its principles on birth ,marriage and death. When this issue of Gay marriage, which goes against core Church values and civil legalities by its wording , creates unnecessary division . Straight away this above article attacks the Catholic Church on “love “ as an underhanded way for support, by manipulating emotions for their Marriage crusade. I see no problem in striving and obtaining a civil union to cover all this. Their commitment, legal rights as partners, etc would be well protected. But no ,challenge the Church etc and force them into civil concerns regarding Society and Spiritual issues.Would it not suit these people better to put their energies into protesting the executions in Iran or injustices elsewhere? It seems better to play victims of a so called injustice and blame the Church etc. I wonder how they would view the Catholic Church ,s ignorance regarding “love “ by Iran,s reception, to them holding hands ,blowing whistles etc.
And people who bang on about divine judgment and the flames of hell awaiting liberals seem to be those who enjoy raking up demons and hellfire. They might take a hint from Dante Alighieri, who knew the circles of hell like the back of his hand. He warned that in this life we practice for the role we'll have in the afterlife.
The people who bang on about God's love never seem to have much time for human love, do they?
Strange this thread will not allow any comment that wont better their biased dribble
Stories like this really make me depressed! As all know, I don't believe any employer has the right to "dictate" who may go out with who, after work. While this edict is not that restrictive, it does attempt to meddle in the romantic lives of it's employees. I know I'd be up in arms if I was told that I couldn't marry a gal who had been divorced!
falconflash- So you know what God thinks?
Hollabuckgirl....eventually we will all be judged as individuals. God could, in fact, forgive some of the people you despise. That is between the individual and God. Somehow if He does, I think you'd be mad at God. Try to develop a hobby or get some exercise as you are obsessed with the Church and are blind to some of the good things IT STANDS FOR.
Hollabuckgirl....eventually we will all be judged as individuals. God could, in fact, forgive some of the people you despise. That is between the individual and God. Somehow if He does, I think you'd be mad at God. Try to develop a hobby or get some exercise as you are obsessed with the Church and are blind to some of the good things IT STANDS FOR.
Hollabuckgirl....eventually we will all be judged as individuals. God could, in fact, forgive some of the people you despise. That is between the individual and God. Somehow if He does, I think you'd be mad at God. Try to develop a hobby or get some exercise as you are obsessed with the Church and are blind to some of the good things IT STANDS FOR.
A sentence in the middle of the article mentions Jesus. That reminds me of the answer our Savior gave when asked about divorce (which was permitted in His day under Jewish law). This was Jesus' answer: "A man shall leave his father and mother and cleve to his wife...". Should we ignore and reject the teachings of Jesus Christ and find it acceptable for every Jane, Kate and Mary to jump into bed with every Tom, Dick and Harry?
Olovely - it is not by far the universal experience you hope for. Not by far. Get over it. My personal experience was shared by a great many and it was caring and nurturing by the wonderful and incredibly Catholic clergy you hate do much.
Some people? You realize that preventing loving couples (heterosexual and homosexual) from forming unions, and living in a world where they find dignity and peace, is one of the Church's mission? It's not 'some people' it's the official teaching. No conservative ever wants to admit the church is standing in the way of love. Because that's exactly what it is doing.
Holla - I understand very well what some people of the Church have done. I feel badly about it, I am distressed about it, I wish it never happened but I also know the Church has done much good which should never be eclipsed by the bad. I was in Catholic schools 15 years; altar boy 6 years: boarding school, different religious such as brothers and nuns and I never saw or heard or even suspected anything immoral, incorrect or untoward. So, come on, don't denounce everyone. I remember so much good and such great religious people. It's sad this is never I acknowledged. .
Sounds like a lovely law suit waiting to be started.
The people inside the gates have done a pretty good job of creating Hell themselves though. That's the problem you don't want to discuss, isn't it falconflash, so you hide behind empty platitudes instead.




Log into IrishCentral with your Facebook account


or sign-in directly

E-Mail:
Password:
 Remember me Forgot my password
Not a member? Register Now!
print this article Print
email this articleE-mail