Manhattan Diary


All you need is love, isn’t it? As long as it reaches the Catholic Church’s approval

Posted on Saturday, February 02, 2013 at 09:17 AM

RSS


Recent Posts

Archives

submit to reddit

Archbishop of Westminster Vincent Nichols (David Rose)


Love, real and enduring love, is exceptionally hard to find. It’s a miraculous flowering that happens in this otherwise coldly indifferent world.

It’s what we live for, love. It’s what creates many of us, it’s what ultimately defines us and it’s certain it’s all that remains of us.

For one reason and another, I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about love. Decades of my time, actually, contemplating it. The fate of love, in particular, has always fascinated me above anything else.

Let’s face it -- most of life is like a visit to a dentist’s office. There are the impersonal stares of all the strangers around us, the receptionist’s interest in making sure we pay, and there’s the internal battle to remain positive faced with the faint dread of what could happen. This is how most of us live.

Given that it is, it’s no wonder we spend so much time in pursuit of a deeper connection.

Not everyone shares my enthusiasm about love, I realize. This week I read that the archbishop of Westminster, Vincent Nichols, announced that if employees want to keep their jobs as teachers in Catholic schools in Britain, they should not marry divorcees, or get married in registry offices, or enter into any other kind of legal civil ceremonies (such as civil partnerships) that do not meet with the Catholic Church’s approval.

Apart from its bracing fundamentalism, that directive is remarkable for its cruelty. Does the archbishop actually believe there is such a surfeit of love in this world that we can cheerfully prescribe how we encounter it?

This stark directive from the archbishop takes aim at both heterosexuals and homosexuals and tells them bluntly that falling for a divorcee or marrying in a borough hall or signing a civil union will not only be disapproved of, it will now get them fired.

A spokesman for the archbishop told the Sunday Times, “The expectation is that school leaders and those who aspire to leadership positions will make substantive life choices that are in conformity with the gospel and the teaching of the Catholic Church.”

Well that’s tidy, isn’t it? Just conform to the church’s increasingly rigid interpretation of the gospel and make the life choice to say goodbye to the person you happen to love.

It’s what Jesus would ask of you, we feel certain. Who could possibly object to that? 

I object, but I know there are a lot of people who feel differently. There are many people who put fidelity to an idea, or faith in a theology, over the untidy realities of our daily lives.

They prefer biting rules to wiggle room. They reject what the poet Michal Longley calls the drunkenness of things being various in favor of the sobriety of a command.

These people fascinate me. In particular their search for clarity, their search for order, at the expense of the complicating insights of their head and heart, at the expense of human experience itself, fascinate me.

All my life I have watched the myriad ways in which otherwise principled people end up saying no to life. Saying no, that is, to the very thing that will save them.

Because their salvation came at the wrong time, or because the person that offered it was the wrong race, or they had the wrong social or religious background, or the wrong gender, or they once said the wrong thing.

Saying no to life, saying no to love, is no small thing. It takes very considerable effort.

It is an exceptionally hard bargain that many people make in anticipation of a later reward (perhaps as late as after life). Once you’ve done it, once you’ve said no to life, which is also saying no to love, both life and love tend to say no right back to you. Often till the end of your days.

This is inevitable, because, as I said, there is so very little love in the world to begin with.

I’ve watched it happen. I have seen people around me possessed by an idea at the expense of own their head and heart.

They will exchange what they think and feel for something they have been told and then tell others. Believing they can do no harm, because they stand for good, they can make loveless wastelands of their own lives.

And here’s one of the things I have learned from watching them -- the hallmark of freedom is generosity, just as the hallmark of love is kindness.

If you can’t find either in the way you’re living or in the way that someone is asking you to live, that’s your first clue you’re going in the wrong direction.

See more: Irish Voice


51 comments

Next Previous Page 2 of 4 pages
anglo norman, this is the Church Jesus founded and He said in dealing with people of your ilk: ...."and the gates of hell will not overcome it."
smyrnian: maybe "what's left of the irish"?
When I was a child and had the blind faith of a child I loved the church with all my heart. Then I grew up and understood that the church is run by men, human beings, who purport to know what "God wants". I'm sure that God wanted the church to hide and cover up the abuse of thousands of innocent children, and they're trying to tell us how to live our lives?? They may be priests and bishops but they're still just men.
The Catholic Church has been doing a standup job of bashing itself, with scandals, abuse crisis, and its arrogant response - to become increasingly hardline, and promote the secrecy that allowed abuse to thrive. People like Smyrnian puzzle me. They haven't much appetite for looking a crisis in the face.
IC exists to bash Catholics. Just the way it is. It also exists to promote abortion as well as many other lefty views and causes. There is nothing 'Central' about this site; it is way left of Central. Should be called 'Irish Left'.
May I add the warning voice message, you have AC/DC, male/female, and invariably Public Christian / Hidden Devil in the same person. So, show me a christian and try to understand why I can't get away from them quickly enough, there theme song should be the Platters song group hit "Yes, I'm the Great Pretender" .....
And Ken nobody here has bashed Jesus Christ regarding the catholic thing, don't be over dramatic son..
It's Vatican bashing really not individual catholics. Ken open your eyes to that corrupt criminal organisation please.
I agree that it's incredibly sad that some religions seek to prevent couples from finding love or safeguarding it under the law.
Are there many catholic in England or GB for that matter.?My church has about 1800 today at one Mass. it is a new church we have 5 in all in the area.
Well said Katieherk, well said.
Wow, how topics like this divide us! From a possible discussion of civil liberties it soon descends into strict constructionist versus "liberals" discussing sex. I grew up (Dominican schools all the way) in an era when morality only began from the waist down and giving "scandal" was the operative word. (God, how many lives were ruined by our silence as a corporate body) It would seem that katiemac might have been a classmate. At 71, I admit to being a hedonist. I love the initial attraction, the pursuit, the mayfly dance, and the the mutual pleasure of sex though I am a poster child for ED. As a widower and then a divorcee and a prostrate cancer survivor (and heart attack), I will take my pleasures now, thank you. The "beatific vision" may or may not exist. I will take my chances and, contrary to Cahir, I see love all around me as defined by St. Francis of Assisi, "wishing well for another".
Wow, how topics like this divide us! From a possible discussion of civil liberties it soon descends into strict constructionist versus "liberals" discussing sex. I grew up (Dominican schools all the way) in an era when morality only began from the waist down and giving "scandal" was the operative word. (God, how many lives were ruined by our silence as a corporate body) It would seem that katiemac might have been a classmate. At 71, I admit to being a hedonist. I love the initial attraction, the pursuit, the dance, and the the mutual pleasure of sex though I am a poster child for ED. As a widower and then a divorcee and a prostrate cancer survivor (and heart attack), I will take my pleasures now, thank you. The "beatific vision" may or may not exist. I will take my chances and, contrary to Cahir, I see love all around me.
Wow, how topics like this divide us! From a possible discussion of civil liberties it soon descends into strict constructionist versus "liberals" discussing sex. I grew up (Dominican schools all the way) in an era when morality only began from the waist down and giving "scandal" was the operative word. (God, how many lives were ruined by our silence as a corporate body) It would seem that katiemac might have been a classmate. At 71, I admit to being a hedonist. I love the initial attraction, the pursuit, the dance, and the the mutual pleasure of sex though I am a poster child for ED. As a widower and then a divorcee and a prostrate cancer survivor (and heart attack), I will take my pleasures now, thank you. The "beatific vision" may or may not exist. I will take my chances and, contrary to Cahir, I see love all around me.
Another great job of "Catholic bashing". Those are the rules, always have been, always will be. If you don't like it, go someplace else. We're sick of you stupid complainers. The rules are the rules!. And, IC, quit with the Catholic bashing, because those of us who love our faith, are hurt by your constant articles on the same.
Next Previous Page 2 of 4 pages




Log into IrishCentral with your Facebook account


or sign-in directly

E-Mail:
Password:
 Remember me Forgot my password
Not a member? Register Now!
print this article Print
email this articleE-mail