Time to rethink rebuilding after Superstorm Sandy - government needs to rethink climate change policies
Posted on Friday, November 02, 2012 at 06:46 AM
RSS 
Recent Posts
- Snoring can be serious - apart from disrupting sleep, noisy sleepers could be in need of medical attention
- Dangers now associated with stop smoking ads - woman lands herself in prison just to break the habit
- Give Cleveland cops a break over Ariel Castro horrific kidnapping and abuse case
- Coenzyme Q10 increases cellular energy, the basis life’s energy - supplement gives boost to body's cells growth and maintenance
- Not all fats are bad for you - the health benefits of eating polyunsaturated and omega fatty acids
Archives
| Part of Long Island were badly damaged by the Superstorm Sandy |
Storms have always plagued coastal areas. However, the damage left in the wake of these storms is becoming more severe and ever more costly. Sandy, a hurricane/ tropical storm/ nor’easter hybrid, devastated my community on Long Island and left me stranded in a city far away, unable to return home due to a crippled transportation system.
As I write this article, I sit in Durham, North Carolina, virtually locked out of my home town, highly concerned about family and friends, with the knowledge that there has been extensive flooding and damage to my community. Houses have washed away, streets are impassable and electrical power is gone, perhaps for weeks.
Of course, in addition to Long Island, countless communities along the eat coast have been decimated by The Sandy Super Storm, especially in New Jersey and lower Manhattan.
Why have recent storms like Sandy been so severe?
We know the climate is changing. This in itself does not necessarily create storms, but it does affect the size, intensity and positioning of these events. And those effects are all for the worse.
The polar ice is melting and the ocean temperatures are rising. There is no scientific debate about that; it is a fact. To the extent that such change is manmade may be more speculative, but irrelevant in terms of what is happening to our weather. Four out of the last five costliest storms in American history have occurred over the last seven years. Insurance companies are aware of this phenomenon which is why the nation’s largest insurers have refused to renew homeowner’s insurance policies to for any home on or near sea water.
Moving forward, government really needs to step up and create policies which adjust to this changing reality. What sense does it make to rebuild large, expensive homes along the shoreline when they are so vulnerable to destruction? Why do we reconstruct whole communities in areas that lie at or below sea level? Why do we use the same designs when we re-erect weather destroyed infrastructure in our towns and cities?
Smart countries who suffer devastating events, such as tsunamis, earthquakes, river flooding and the like do not simply rebuild – they access and redesign. They make adaptations and impose policies which leave their citizens less vulnerable to harm.
When I finally do get home, I will make the necessary repairs to my home, a home that will be without power for quite some time based on prior experience. At some point, I will observe an electric utility truck at or near my house. The technician will climb a utility pole, the same archetype pole first erected over 100 years ago. He will fiddle, fuss and fix for a bit, and …puff! My lights will come on. I’ll have heat again too. Halleluiah!
Halleluiah, at least for the time being…halleluiah, until the next inevitable storm.
As we witness our damaged buildings, flooded roads, closed railways, and broken telephone poles, as we fiddle, fuss and fix, as we tinker with our infrastructure, in our hearts we know that moving forward - America can and must do much better.
8 Comments
See all comments
EphraimKibbey | Nov 03, 2012, 10:22 PM EDT
stephendoyle - I'm inland in Cincinnati, Ohio. We have tornados and our river floods every April - ask Cirque de Soleil how wet their tents got at our Coney Island last year. Hurricane Ike even paid us a visit after ravaging Galvaston a few years back. None of us are safe anywhere so all of us must help each other when they are victims. That is the whole point of taxes and big government.
Report abuse
stephendoyle | Nov 03, 2012, 09:26 AM EDT
You are just as guilty by living where you do. Practice what you preach and move inland.
Report abuse
jimgordo1 | Nov 02, 2012, 04:54 PM EDT
"At some point, I will observe an electric utility truck at or near my house. The technician will climb a utility pole, the same archetype pole first erected over 100 years ago. He will fiddle, fuss and fix for a bit, and …puff! My lights will come on. I’ll have heat again too. Halleluiah!"
And why will the technician have to "climb the pole" because our electric utilities have deemed it "too expensive" to bury the lines. They'd rather pay out billions in restoring service rather than paying millions to bury the lines so we wouldn't have to go thru this every time there's a major storm.
Report abuse
EphraimKibbey | Nov 02, 2012, 01:32 PM EDT
I'm a retired science teacher. Science teachers in PUBLIC schools have been teaching climate change for twenty years and suggesting ways of countering its effects. Porickseantuny you are reading propaganda from the fossil fuel industry that, like the tobacco industry before it, has a vested interest in denying the facts. I just left the TV where they were announcing another Atlantic storm that may reach our coast as soon as midweek. Even for those still in the first stage of grief (denial) over global warming and the resultant climate change, it seems imprudent for them to fight sensible redesign of infrastructure. If Sandy will cost 100 billion or more in replacing infrastructure and lost revenue, why not rebuild with future storms in mind. Even New Yorkers of the 1888 Blizzard got the message and rebuilt so that utilities were protected. Thanks for a great article Doc.
Report abuse
katiemac | Nov 02, 2012, 01:18 PM EDT
Hogwash!This is hurrican season (for about 13 more days), you fool. What is truly the miracle is that this was only a category 1 storm. I would hate to see what a 3 or 4 would do to the upper East coast. The real problem here is the density of population in low coastal areas. This wasn't called New Amsterdam for nothing. There should have been sizeable seawalls built decades ago.
New York and New Jersey (and others) have been throwing the dice and winning for most of the last century. I think the last real killing storm went into Rhode Island 1938 or 39. So don't be going all Henny Penny on us because of one storm. Particularly as there have been fewer storm during the last couple of hurricane seasons. Your choices are to build a big seawall (at the expense of NY state, not my fed dollars) to assure it never happens again, or not, in which case this will happen in another 100 years and you will just have to suck it up.
Report abuse
Porickseantuny | Nov 02, 2012, 01:02 PM EDT
Doctor of what? Certainly not science. Typical greenie scare tactics. When they realized that "warming" was not occuring they changed to "change". Of Course climate is changing. It has changed numerous times over the milleniums. I have read articles regarding the polar ice cap. They scream melting, but only toward the end of the article do they point out that the ice only began measurement in 1978. All the measurements of the greeies are like a camera taking pictures a high speed. The apperature needs to be for slow motion. However, I do agree since Americans have begun to build homes close to the ocean for the pleasure of it, they should not expect the rest of us to insure them from the risk they have decided to take. (Not talking about the poor souls whose main homes have been ravaged)
Report abuse
CelticQueenUSA | Nov 02, 2012, 11:48 AM EDT
Stop the political posturing and get to work for AMERICA's needs. EARN YOUR SALARIES CONGRESS!!
Report abuse
8 Comments
Report abuse