Don't blame Notre Dame's Brian Kelly for Bearcats blowout in Sugar Bowl
Published Saturday, January 2, 2010, 10:12 AM
Updated Saturday, January 2, 2010, 8:15 PM
3 comments
Return to article
Page 1 of 1 pages
roadhawk | Jan 02, 2010, 04:41 PM EST
Are you kidding? Cincinnatti stunk on D the whole year. Kelly would have made no difference at all against Florida. Notre Dame got a better PR version of Weiss.
Notre Dame needed somebody who could run a ball-controll offense to protect the D, instead you got a no-huddle spread offense guy.
You wanted Kelly, you got him. The good & the bad.
Report abuse
bearcatbill | Jan 02, 2010, 02:17 PM EST
Cincy might have scored a couple more point if he were still there, but to think he would have had any more of a defensive game plan is just plain stupid. He hasn't organized much of one all season, much less in the last half of the year. Why would anyone expect that would change for the Sugar Bowl? He's left that to Diaco, and we see where that has left them. Now you get to experience their wonderful "defensive plan" next year.
Report abuse
Page 1 of 1 pages
- Horse disemboweled and sliced open in horrific.
- Senator Schumer says Irish deserve a separate...
- Irish footballer under investigation after...
- Irish politician refuses to back down on...
- Bill O'Reilly claims the Obama administration...
- Delphi Lodge takes responsibility for turning...
- Chilling testimony before congressional hearing
- Sex addiction on the rise says Dublin Clinic...
- British emigrant group calls on government...
- Gerry Adams accuses British government of...
3 Comments

Report abuse