roots


1641 massacre of Protestants by Catholics a fiction says experts

New light on a central moment in Irish history is revealed



Guinness PubFinder Ad

Oliver Cromwell used it as his excuse to rape and pillage Ireland, but the 1641 ‘massacre’ of Protestants by Catholics during the Irish rebellion likely never happened.

New research by the University of Aberdeen in Scotland claims to have unveiled the real truth about Protestant settlers during the 1641 Irish rebellion -- contrary to previously held beliefs, the settlers, numbering in the thousands, were not massacred by the Irish during the rebellion.

The research is based on 8,000 witness statements, known as the 1641 Depositions, that were digitized by Trinity College in Dublin last year. These depositions prompted the notorious Oliver Cromwell to subsequently take revenge on Ireland and commence a brutal military campaign there, but Aberdeen researchers say that the depositions were based on “hearsay” as opposed to hard facts.

The researchers questioned the use of “the depositions as evidence, pinpointing hearsay as a basis for testimony and demonstrating that many of the most atrocious incidents were reported second or even third-hand more often than in the first person.”

The depositions alleged that women and children were massacred by the Irish during the 1641 rebellion, but the digitization of the depositions, researchers say, reveals new truths.

"One of the iconic narratives that comes up in hearsay evidence is reports of atrocities against pregnant women who were said to have been ripped open, had their babies pulled out and beaten against rocks," said Dr Mark Sweetnam, a scholar who has studied the texts.

"That image is drawing on biblical prophecy ... and contemporary accounts of European massacres.

"It's very striking that it crops up regularly in hearsay accounts but I never came across an example of it in eyewitness evidence.

"While these depositions were being taken, they were being leaked and published in London with the clear intention that they would elicit the sympathy of English Protestants."

The rebellion of October 1641, was an attempt to drive Protestant settlers off Catholic land. It had massive impact on Ireland through the centuries.

Software from IBM adapted 19,000 pages of depositions, and showed that words like “believeth” and “thinketh” were used far more than more definitive declarations like “saw” and “witnessed.”

“We have been able to show that there are significant differences between the use of words and phrases meaning ‘heard’ as opposed to ‘saw’ when it comes the worst atrocities reported within the depositions, such as an act of cannibalism and many of the more infamous events,” said forensic linguist Dr. Nicci MacLeod.


Nster.com


35 Comments

15 - 35 | See all comments

why cant the catholic church admit the murder of protestants in ireland which sometimes carried the papel bull
Actually, experts did NOT say it was 'fiction' as described in this headline but that a lot of the dispositions was hearsay. Were in this article did the experts say a massacre did not happen?? Thousands of people were murdered but not the 100s of thousands as claimed in propaganda at the time. I'm sure if this was about a catholic massacre IrishCental.com would be a lot more accurate with their headlines... but then Patrick O'Brien probably doesn't regard protestants as 'real' Irish.
OLLY WAS A MANIC DEPRESSIVE: Having fought to overcome his poor health trying and knock Democracy into the Parliament of the Big Island, it is understandable that he was not going to be as patient with the paddies next door. WE all brag about our Precious Democracy and forget how many people we have killed trying to impose it! ~ ~ ~ If it wasn't for Cromwell we would still be bowing and scraping to our Royal Masters Ruling by Devine Right! Irish voters,don't forget to exercise the right he fought to get for you! Go out and VOTE!
well to the victors go the spoils & a chance to rewrite history from their point of view, this has occurred throughout history & continues in irish history as well
Sounds logical to me. Not unlike what still happens in this day and age. Surprised recently to meet people (Irish) who actually admire Cromwell and what he achieved.
as noted by shankill below, a very selective part of the actual statement was produced, the argument seems to be that only 4,000-12,000 were killed instead of 20,000. The purile comments of the RC church also make the case for a holy war against the prods. of course to most republicans the prods have never be acceptable as 'irishmen', wolfe must be spinning in his grave, not that it won't be floated down the shannon once the PIRA UI is in force, or he maybe the last prod in ireland. RA needs to have everybody believing that the 1641 massacres didn't occur, because, everyone around the world are ignorant of the prods being persecuted before the 26 county republic came into being
I'm an atheist, but I'm sure if there were a hell, then Cromwell would be there
Therefore there is not enough proof to say it didn't happen and if that is the case the presumption of innocents is paramount.
seanomelbourne..All I'm saying is there is not enough proof to say it didn't happen..It is understood that it did happen. You can jump to conclusions that they were falsified..I don't think so..I don't see any proof that they didn't happen..As an Irish nationalist, I'm not going to take away a protestant massacre without solid proof.I'm after the truth and there is not enough proof.Ulster Unionist's have their grievances too and to undermine what is at the moment historically true would be wrong.
Academics from the University of Aberdeen have been given a £334,000 grant to examine the depositions of English and Scottish settlers about the masscre of Protestants in Ulster in 1641. The 4,000 depositions are held in Trinity College Dublin and describe the events of that terrible time. The historians will use cutting-edge software to examine and cross-reference names, places, words and phrases in an effort to establish just how many people were murdered. The most recent estimates put the figure at between 4,000 and 12,000. There can be no doubt that the Irish rebels had a sectarian motivation. Writing on 7 December 1641 Father Hugh Bourke, at that time commisary of the Irish Friars Minor in Germany and Belgium, admitted that the war was ‘begun solely in the interest of the Catholic and Roman religion’. [Jesuit Plots p 163; Report on Franciscan Manuscripts, Command Paper 2867, HMSO 1906] Indeed the fact that this was a Roman Catholic rebellion against Protestantism was acknowledged by the Jesuit writer Oliver P Rafferty in his history of Roman Catholicism in Ulster: 'The bloody Ulster uprising of 1641 ... represented ... a spontaneous outpouring of hatred against Protestantism and all it stood for.' [Catholicism in Ulster 1603-1983 p 1] But what was the extent of the massacre? In the past there were grossly exaggerated figures but even if it were only 4,000 or 12,000 people it was still a dreadful massacre and left a dreadful legacy of hatred and fear. Even the lower figure of 4,000 is greater than the number of people killed in the recent Troubles in Northern Ireland and yet the killing happened at a time when the Protestant population of Ulster was much smaller, around 100,000. Furthermore it happened in a much shorter period and in addition to those who were murdered, many others died as a result of ill treatment and deprivation.
if u read the full text of the statement there are still 4,000-12,000 protestants killed, all they are debating is that Cromwell falsified his records to record the number of victims at 20,000, as the historical statements are taken from both catholic & protestants witnesses. Also there is no denial of the Portadown massacre
The Irish are normally the victims. Let Oliver Cromwell rot in hell!
Cromwell would not have hesitated to manufacture false accounts of violence if it enabled hime to take "revenge" upon Catholics - or anyone else who opposed his views. Just an all-around nice guy. Remember, news was not spread quickly, so the first account - true or false - was the first acted upon.
Was the slaughter in Drogheda contrived as well?
A short one, anyone old enough to remember the American films about Cowboys and Indians, it was always a one sided story.




Log into IrishCentral with your Facebook account


or sign-in directly

E-Mail:
Password:
 Remember me Forgot my password
Not a member? Register Now!
print this article Print
email this articleE-mail