Opinion


Dublin jeers at rural Ireland fall flat


Haypenny Bridge, Dublin: Dublin ranked 42nd most expensive city in the world
Dublin, Ireland

The recent stag hunting debate highlighted an increasing divide in Irish society: Dublin vs. the rest.

Of course, this phenomenon really just represents the latest manifestation of the centuries-old distinction between the Pale and the rest of Ireland. It is also a reinvigoration of a debate that has raged ever since the Grimm brothers wrote the story “Town Mouse and Country Mouse.”

Underlying much of the recent commentary emanating from Dublin are snide assumptions that rural Ireland consists essentially of uneducated barbarians. The facts, however, suggest precisely the opposite: Take the HEA report “Who Went to College in 2004? A National Survey of New Entrants to Higher Education”

As in previous reports, counties along the western seaboard all enjoy the highest rates of admission to higher education with Sligo at 70.5%, followed by Galway (67.4%), Kerry (67%) and Mayo (66.8%). Dublin however, sits close to the bottom of the table with only 50.8% going to third level, falling to 11.7% in Ballyfermot.

Allied the fact that crime rates are far higher in Dublin than in rural Ireland, the unavoidable conclusion is that uneducated barbarians are in fact within the Pale, not outside of it.

Yet, you wouldn’t think it to read The Irish Times. Take for example a recent article: “The future is urban, where 'Up Mayo' politics won't do.”

Typical of the readers comments it provoked were: “Can't we just split the country in two. Have pales of civilisation, and leave all the farmers and their rural representatives to live as they choose.  We could have two different time zones. One on Greenwich Meridian Time [sic.], and the other thirty years in the past.”

Zulu time, indeed. Others yearned to see politicians with “IQs higher than room temperature and followers who care more about their country than obtaining planning permission for a cow-shed.”

It is unfortunate to see such sneering hostility emerging. Yet there is no doubt that we are beginning to see two Irelands emerge with markedly contrasting values and lifestyles: Greater Dublin and the rest of Ireland.

Dr. Lorcan Sirr and Conor Skehan who jointly wrote the piece, both lecture in the college of engineering and the built environment at Dublin Institute of Technology. They say “The Rubicon was crossed in 1966 when the urban and rural populations of Ireland were exactly equal for the first time. Since then, Ireland’s urban area and its population have increased considerably and now almost 60 per cent of Ireland’s population live in urban areas across the State. Around Dublin, the urbanised area has increased by about 150 per cent from 1990 to 800sq km in 2006."


Nster.com


4 Comments

See all comments

NOW I REALIZE WHY THEY WERE ALWAYS CALLED THE DUBLIN JACKEEEEENS...
George Dillon I think you misspeak for everyone outside of Dublin!
This is more stupidity from the columnist that is earning a name as IrishCentral's biggest idiot. Apart from friendly rivalry, there is no antipathy between Dublin and the rest of the country. In fact most Dubliners have a parent--or two--who is not from Dublin. Most country people have a son-or daughter--who lives in Dublin. The real tension is between Irish people and the foreign immigrants who now dominate in some Irish towns. According to all available opinion polls, fully 70% iof Irish people are opposed to mass Immigration. The foreign immigrants were brought into the country without consulting the people of Ireland--Dublin and rural--as to whether they acquiesced in this colonization. That's the real issue, Fitzgerald, don't be an idiot in trying to manufacture a split that doesn't exist.
I'm from rural Ireland and I pity anyone who isn't. !
 




Log into IrishCentral with your Facebook account


or sign-in directly

E-Mail:
Password:
 Remember me Forgot my password
Not a member? Register Now!
print this article Print
email this articleE-mail