Attorney Mark O’Mara will have the eyes of the world upon him as he takes on the position of defense lawyer for George Zimmerman, the man charged with second degree murder of Trayvon Martin, a minor, in Florida.
When asked why he took this case, despite the unpopularity of Zimmerman’s side of the story, O’Mara told AP, “It's what I do.
“I've done it for a long, long time. I think I'm pretty good at it. Mr. Zimmerman needs a very good and focused defense so we're going to build him one.”
O’Mara, originally from Queens, New York, followed his parents to Florida after high school, as his father had retired to the south after a career as president of the fire officers union.
He said he had known since grade school that he wanted to be an attorney.
"As a good Irish Catholic boy, the first possibility was to be a priest," O'Mara said. "The second one was to be a lawyer."
As a defense lawyer O’Mara sees himself on the “front line” of protecting civil liberties.
"People harass criminal defense attorneys sometimes, but it's like going to a dentist — you never really want to go to one but you want them there when you need one," O'Mara said. "Not to sound too uppity about it, but we're the ones who really make sure the rest of us can enjoy the liberties that the Constitution guarantees, and that it's done right if it's going to be done at all.”
O’Mara, a central Florida defense attorney and former prosecutor, has nearly 30 years experience having represented clients in criminal cases running the gamut from drunk driving to the death penalty.
Most famously he became a household name on the local Orlando station, WKMG Channel 6, during Casey Anthony’s trial last year. O’Mara appeared regularly to air his critique on how the case was being handled.
O’Mara’s latest client, Zimmerman, has been charged with the second degree murder of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, who was allegedly just walking home from the convenience store to his father’s fiancée’s home on 26th February. The 28-year-old self appointed neighborhood watch volunteer, Zimmerman, called the cops but before they had arrived he shot the unarmed teenager.
Residents heard shouts for help and gunshots. Martin was found dead with a gunshot wound to the chest.
This will be a tough case for O’Mara, but it seems that his colleagues see him as a man up to the job.
Defense attorney Randy McCLean told AP, "He is not someone who is going to loud-talk or try to be bossy. I think he comes across as knowledgeable and confident."
Last week O’Mara showed this confidence. He took on Zimmerman’s case after his ex-attorneys had dropped their client, deeming his behavior erratic.
O’Mara has said he will not take a fee from Zimmerman and has expressed concern about papers, which could violate the privacy of his client and Martin.
Speaking in court, O’Mara said, “He's frightened.” He went on to describe the case as "a horrible intersection of two young men's lives and it ended in tragedy. We have to figure out how it happened, why it happened, and who might be responsible for it."
The Florida attorney told the Associated Press that he joined the case after he was contacted by the Zimmerman family.
Zimmerman has told authorities that he shot Trayvon in self-defense and Florida’s so-called “stand your ground” law could provide a possible argument for his case. This law allows the public to use deadly force rather than retreat during a fight if threatened.
O’Mara says Zimmerman will invoke this law and ask the court to drop the case in a pretrial hearing.
O'Mara said, "It is going to be a facet of this defense, I'm sure, That statute has some troublesome portions to it and we're now going to have some conversations and discussions about it as a state. But right now it is the law of Florida and it is the law that is going to have an impact on this case."
In mid-March, before he took on Zimmerman as a client, O’Mara, said on WKMG that Zimmerman’s actions could be legally justified under the “Stand Your Ground” law.
He said, "People call it the license-to-murder statute because it doesn't require actions to avoid the confrontation…If you can present evidence or at least your own testimony that (you) felt in fear that he was going to commit great bodily injury or death, that is what kicks in the statutory protection that you're allowed to respond with deadly force."