News


Woman refused right to die by assisted suicide by Irish court

Multiple Sclerosis sufferer loses bid to end her life with aid of partner


Terminally-ill Marie Fleming leaving the High Court in Dublin on Tuesday December 4, 2012., with her partner Tom Curran,
Terminally-ill Marie Fleming leaving the High Court in Dublin on Tuesday December 4, 2012., with her partner Tom Curran,
Photo by PA Wire

Guinness PubFinder Ad

Multiple Sclerosis sufferer Marie Fleming has been denied the right to take her life with an assisted suicide by Ireland’s High Court.

The 58-year-old has failed with her legal battle against the country’s blanket ban on assisted suicide.

The former college lecturer was told by Justice Nicholas Kearns on Thursday morning that the specially convened three judge Divisional Court had unanimously rejected her bid to end her life with the assistance of another.

The Irish Independent reports that Justice Kearns described Fleming as a ‘humbling and inspiring’ person.

Announcing the decision, he said: “She is one of the most remarkable witnesses to come before the courts. Her experience is harrowing.”

He also explained that the Divisional Court had rejected Fleming’s claims under the Constitution and the European Convention of Human Rights.

The Irish Independent reports that the court said that it was ‘impossible’ to liberalise the law on assisted suicide and at the same time protect vulnerable persons such as the aged, the disabled, the poor, the unwanted and others including those who were financially compromised who may be vulnerable to assisted suicide.

The court had heard that Fleming is in the final stages of the illness and would require help to end her own life.

Fleming is wheelchair-bound and needs 24/7 care. Partner Tom Curran provides that care, and the 59-year-old woman is trying to win the choice of end her life with his help should her suffering become too much.

As the Irish suicide law stands – suicide was decriminalized in the country in 1993 – if Curran helps Fleming to end her life then he could be sentenced to 14 years in prison.

"We are taking this case on both our behalfs," Curran told the Irish Independent. "Marie may never exercise the decision (to end her life), but I am willing to go to prison if needs be.

Read more: Ill Irish woman sues for right to die with her partner’s help

“It would give Marie such comfort, such peace of mind, to know that I will be there for her and that she will not have to suffer needlessly. It would give her comfort to know I could help without the threat of prison. Peace of mind, that is what this case is about."

Suicide was decriminalised under Irish law in 1993 but assisted suicide remains a criminal offence attracting a prison term of up to 14 years.

Mother of two Fleming had claimed that the strict ban on assisted suicide was unconstitutional and in breach of the European Convention on Human Rights.

She claimed that the ban violates her rights to dignity, privacy and autonomy.


See more: Irish Medical News
Nster.com


20 Comments

See all comments

Thanks be to God!!
Why can't people mind their own business.Shoving their own personal beliefs down other peoples throat! If a terminal illness,I'm going to die...that's what terminal means.I don't want to drag out for me or for my loved ones.So,I guess I'll have to use a 9mm before I have to, because some self absorbed religious nut thinks they what's best for me and my family. Hope,they rot in the hell they believe in!
It been known for a long time that when some terminaly ill patents request with their medical adviser that their medication be reduced gradually so as to induce coma and therefore shorten the period when death accurs,is not seen as assisting in suicide.
Gearoid4. There is no Divisional Court in Ireland. You must be thinking of England. There is no law in Ireland to prevent anyone from killing themselves.
this assisted suicide and fast racking is very worrying,i went into casualty for aspirins and they stuck a fast track notice on me,i barely escaped.
The 3 judge Divisional Court has made the right decision concerning a subject that is very harrowing in terms of the physical pain suffered by patients and and the mental anguish of their relatives and friends. The wider implications of legally letting someone suffering from intense pain kill themselves directly by their own hands or with the help of others, would introduce a precedent that would be too awful to contemplate. Initially it looks compassionate on a superficial level but the nihilism and despair at the heart of such an ideology devalues the worth of people. It only views them in utilitarian and materialistic terms and fails to take account of their inherent spiritual value and integrity. It would undermine the whole area of medical treatment for patients with life-threatening or very serious illnesses/conditions by fatally compromising the ethics of the medical profession. It will also make patients fearful in respect to the attitudes that might greet them in the hospital wards.
The 3 judge Divisional Court has made the right decision concerning a subject that very harrowing in terms of the physical pain suffered by patients and and the mental anguish of their relatives and friends. The wider implications of legally letting someone suffering from intense pain kill themselves directly by their own hands or with the help of others, would introduce a precedent that would be too awful to contemplate. Initially it looks compassionate on a superficial level but the nihilism and despair at the heart of such ideology devalues the worth of people who happen to suffer from very serious illnesses/diseases. It only views them in utilitarian and materialistic terms and fails to take account of their inherent spiritual value and integrity. It would undermine the whole area of medical treatment for patients with life-threatening or very serious illnesses/conditions by fatally compromising the ethics of the medical profession. It will also make patients fearful in respect to the attitudes that might greet them in the hospital wards.
It's a lot easier to judge pain and suffering when it's someone else who is enduring it. There are people who are in excruciating pain 24/7 (in spite of pain meds)to the extent that the quality of their life is Zero. They have no life outside of their pain and suffering. As an RN, I've seen people with ALS, cancer, constant seizures, aggressive forms of CF and MS...very easy for people who suffer relatively mild aches and pains to make judgments about those who have no life except severe pain and suffering and who are totally dependent on others 24/7 for their care.
if Marie Fleming went to Galway those doctors who killed the Indian lady might help!
Cynicus -- Under Irish law, everyone is entitled to end their own life if they choose to do so. Unlimited suicide, as you describe it, is already a right in our law. This is a case involving a woman who is too restricted in movement to end the hell she is experiencing. Consequently, she will die in misery and indignity instead of at a time and place of her own choosing as we would all wish for ourselves.
Life is more important then pain. Pain is not a reason to take your own life. Everyday some one suffers
Of course no one will ever know how Justice Kearns plans to manage his pain as he gets closer to death. It's all very well to talk about death in the abstract when sitting on the bench and another matter when one is actively dying.
Cynicus - if you can't see WKnee's point you are beyond rehab. In the one case (abortion) the person being killed has no choice (decided by others) and in the other case a person is deciding for himself/herself. Get it?
One of the things I'm surpised that the VAT in rome hasnt tried to outlaw aspirin - which OD can kill your kidneys and liver Time to be free of the vat of rome, whose idea of protecting life is to UNexcommunicate bishop Williamson a holocaust denier in 2009 Proving once again that "protecting life is BS", theonly thing he wants to protect is his own power over others.
I think of all those persons who suffered in the same way, and who bore their tragic pain and suffering with fortitude and dignity, and with courage. WoundedKnee seems to advocate unlimited suicide as a 'right' - yet says s/he is 'pro-life!' I suppose it's 'easy to sleep on another man's wound,' as the old Irish proverb states.




Log into IrishCentral with your Facebook account


or sign-in directly

E-Mail:
Password:
 Remember me Forgot my password
Not a member? Register Now!
print this article Print
email this articleE-mail