News


Surgeon at Drogheda hospital to face indecent assault charges on 16 young boys

Dr Michael Shine to appear before court in October


Dr Michael Shine
Dr Michael Shine
Photo by Google Images

Guinness PubFinder Ad

A former top surgeon is to face trial on charges of indecently assaulting 16 young boys over three decades from the 1960s.

Dr Michael Shine, now 80 and retired, has been charged with 25 counts of indecent assault at Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital in Drogheda and at a clinic in the town.

The Irish Times reports that Shine, now resident in Dublin, appeared before Judge Cormac Dunne at Dublin District Court.

Detective Nicholas Kelly told Judge Dunne that the retired surgeon replied ‘not guilty’ after caution to 24 of the charges.

His response to the other charge was: “Not guilty, I was not in Ireland at the time.”

The consultant surgeon was arrested near the courthouse, for the purpose of being charged. The report says he remained seated and silent for most of the brief hearing.

Detective Kelly told the court that the Director of Public Prosecutions has directed that the retired doctor is to face a Circuit Court trial before a judge and jury.

The detective also asked for a remand to allow time for the book of evidence to be completed.

In response to police requests for bail conditions, the court heard from Shine’s solicitor that he planned to go on holidays to the Canary Islands in August for a couple of months.

His solicitor also claimed that it could take until early 2014 before his client’s Circuit Court trial goes ahead.

Judge Dunne decided not to impose the signing-on condition or to order Shine to surrender his passport.

The report states that the judge stipulated that he must directly inform police if he planned to change address, with 14 days advance notice.

The Irish Times reports Judge Dunne also said it was equally important that the retired surgeon would have to give them seven days’ notice if he had intentions of leaving Ireland and advise them of his departure and return dates.

Shine spoke only once during the brief hearing, replying ‘yes’ when asked if he understood the terms.

He was remanded on bail in his own bond of $6,000 and was ordered to appear again in October when he will be served with a book of evidence and returned for trial.


Nster.com


6 Comments

See all comments

"on charges of assaulting 16 'young boys' over three decades from the 1960's". - so the charges date from the 1960's, 1970's, and 1980's? This is absurd, a travesty of justice. What kind of 'Police' force do you have in Ireland that would accept allegations FIFTY YEARS after the alleged events? What kind of Prosecutors would try to build on such a stale case? How can one be expected to accept such accusations at face value, 20 to 50 years down the pike? And why only NOW, over 50 YEARS after the 1960's, is this man being charged? Those 'young boys' would have long-since have reached adulthood, yet they only come up with this NOW? How does any defendent answer charges, mount a defense, provide alibis or even know where the heck they WERE "at 3:45 pm on June 14,1963?" As for you, "JAZZETTE", if your husband felt abused at age 26 years in 1985, he had every right THEN to lay a complaint. He is now presumably about 53 years old, so it's no good for either your "husband" or his "many friends" who "knew about the misconduct" (if ANY of these people truly exist) to carp about it now. I call BS on YOU, your many unnamed 'witnesses', and on this whole trumped-up process!
In the mid 80's my husband (who was 26 at the time) was also seen by Dr Shine for a head injury and Dr. Shine start feeling his private parts pretending to examine him, until my husband told him off. Many of my husbands friends knew about the misconduct of Dr. Shine. The man is a monster for abusing the trust of his patients and I hope he pays for what he did.
This diatribe (sparticusnorth0 should have been edited or refused print. Obviously the writer is a hate monger (radical homosexual style). He hates me, he hates my faith, he even hates God for having founded His Church. It is a wonder the writer has not accused the offender of being a priest. Just because he worked in a hospital bearing a Catholic title, he presumes the man was Catholic. Please be careful what you are printing on your website. It would not look good to have a 'hate' suit brought against Irish Central in your continued anti-Catholic bias. Hatred does not bring happiness, constructive criticism does.
what's wrong with so many - its been going on for ever it seems.
He was given free license to run as he was allowed to keep his passport.
Everyone in Drogheda knew of this one as well as Eerie Neary, but they were protected by their own elite. He will be dead before the hearing no doubt or judge will feel sorry for him.
 




Log into IrishCentral with your Facebook account


or sign-in directly

E-Mail:
Password:
 Remember me Forgot my password
Not a member? Register Now!
print this article Print
email this articleE-mail