News


Pair from Loyalist group in court for attempted murder of Celtic boss Neil Lennon

Jurors hear from postman who first discovered suspicious parcel


Celtic gaffer Neil Lennon
Celtic gaffer Neil Lennon

Guinness PubFinder Ad

The jury in the trial of two men accused of a murder plot against Celtic’s Neil Lennon, were shown pictures of the contents of a suspicious package sent to the football manager.

Suspected Loyalist sympathisers Trevor Muirhead (43) and Neil McKenzie (42) stand accused of conspiring to murder Neil Lennon, Paul McBride QC, former Member of the Scottish Parliament (MSP) Trish Godman and members of the Glasgow offices of the Irish nationalist organisation Cairde Na Heirann, by sending them improvised explosive devices (IED) in the post.

The package that was sent to Lennon allegedly contained an IED police believed could potentially cause severe injury and death.

It is also alleged that the package, which was sent to Celtic’s training centre, enclosed a plastic bottle containing the substance tri-acetone tri-peroxide with a wire attached, a plastic bag containing a bag of nails and a watch.

Both of the accused are from Ayrshire and have also been charged with sending devices to Trish Godman MSP.

The trial began on Monday at the Glasgow High Court. The court heard how Andrew Brown, a Royal Mail postman became suspicious when he picked up a package from a post box on March 4, 2010.

"When I felt it, there were different textures. It just didn't feel right. There were sharp edges," Brown told the court.

Brown said he was aware of the “scuffle” which had taken place between Lennon and the  Rangers manager Ally McCoist, at an Old Firm match. He recalled the package stood out as it was addressed to Lennon. He informed his supervisors upon his return to the Saltcoats sorting office.

Upon inspection Andrew Easton, a Royal Mail line manager said the contents "felt like a bag of nails".

The police were called and the building was evacuated before specialist officers inspected the package. The court heard it was later established to be a fake “hoax nail bomb”.

The jury of 11 women and four men were shown photographs of the items contained in the package.

The trial continues and is expected to last between two and three weeks.


Nster.com


22 Comments

See all comments

Seano - I guess you missed the point (again) - Paul McBride QC was allegedly targetted by the accused here - and tellingly, not a word from you on the innocent victims of republican or loyalist murder gangs...by your friends you shall be known??
RIP Bobby Sands and all his comrades.BTW RIP Sean McBride International jurist,Nobel prize winner,Lenin peace prize winner(the only person to receive both awards) and his roll as the former chief of staff Irish Republican Army.
RIP Paul McBride QC...condolences to his family...
So not just cheerleading, but funding as well...do you never wonder what bit of the 'heroic armed struggle' your funds paid for...maybe the gallant bombing of the Omagh children? Don't you feel just a little ashamed of your support for Irishmen killing their fellow countrymen? While you slept peacefully in your distant bed? Now that's what I call pathetic!!
If you are referring to me my family were involved in the armed struggle and organizing fund raising in Australia for Sinn Fein.Unlike you I am not oblivious to the blood spilling of the Brits and the terrorist surrogate unionists doing their dirty work. Your anti Irish rantings are typical of your ilk. The blood of nationalist is of less value than anyone else how pathetic. Your a Brit and ashamed to admit it.
Your so-called 'armed struggle' (a euphemism for bombing and mayhem) ... found many innocent men, women and children paying a heavy price...and for what??? Apologist armchair cheerleaders, living thousands of miles away were, of course, safely walking their own streets; oblivious then, and oblivious now, to the blood on their hands...
Unionist thuggery is correct, some unionists may have shunned the thuggery of their brethren but it was still unionist thuggery a spade is still a spade regardless of which end you try to dig you holes.As I said before the half glass SDLP were sent packing they could not find a unionists to agree with them. You are still condoning unionist thuggery by pretending it did not exist.A thuggery that was brought to heel by an armed struggle.
Seano - You are conveniently forgetting some of the other 'key players' at the time...the SDLP/Brit Labour Party(at times) etc....and conveniently combining all the unionist strands and labelling them as Loyalist thugs (of which there were many)...this is the SF/IRA narrative...not to be confused with actuality...a blind eye looking down a blind alley??
Sinn Fein did not start this conflict it was unionist bigotry and intransigence.Their inability to negotiate and their bully boy tactics during the peace marches.How easy is it for you re-invent history to justify you condoning(by your silence) the excesses of unionist thuggery the blind eye of the British government at that time.
Seano - not ameliorating or justifying...the fact is the Republicans wanted to change things, the Loyalists would 'win' if things stayed the same...they were handed that victory, when they should have been pressured into accepting more fundamental changes...bombings just stregthened their hand, and the changes to the constitution was the outcome...that's how it looks to me...
Dan is happy ameliorating Orange/British terror to suit his proactive re-invention of the facts.
Only those who try to justify one Irishman killing another should be considered anti-Irish...SF/IRA promoted the mayhem to coerce those who did not agree with them...the Loyalist violence was largely reactionary...a permanent ceasefire in the late seventies, and putting political pressure on the likes of the DUP, would have been more astute...and that's not hindsight.
Your anti-Irish views are noted Dan and your ignorance of republicanism is disappointing.The years of mayhem are a two way street take that patch of your eye.
seanomelb - Sinn Fein would love an inclusive Ireland??? Maybe they should have demonstrated this to those victims of their fellow travellers, bombed and shot in the years of mayhem??? Then a UI would be a good deal closer...
IrelandNorth - Dissenters WERE Christians...Scots and Welsh ARE British...Unionists WILL decide to accept a UI, or not...just like it says in the revised Constitution...




Log into IrishCentral with your Facebook account


or sign-in directly

E-Mail:
Password:
 Remember me Forgot my password
Not a member? Register Now!
print this article Print
email this articleE-mail