Margaret Thatcher: ‘would not stand in the way of Irish unification’
Former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher’s government said they would not stand in the way of a united Ireland, new documents have revealed.
State files released for the first time show that the Conservative Government told Dublin it had more interest in Northern Ireland than London.
However the then-Secretary of State, Humphrey Atkins told the then Foreign Affairs Minister Brian Lenihan that "there would be an explosion" if news emerged that they were making strides towards reunification.
According to Irish government notes of a meeting between the two elected officials on April 15, 1980 Mr Akins said: “One step would have to be taken at a time".
"There was 'no way' he could go round promoting Irish unity. This was simply not possible. That was not to say, however, that it was something that the British government would stand in the way of."
The previously unseen notes show that Mr Akins advised the then Irish Prime Minister, Charles Haughey on the apparent British position.
"The secretary of state indicated that he had said to the Taoiseach the Irish Government's interest in Northern Ireland was greater than any other party except of course the people of Northern Ireland," the notes reveal.
One year later Mrs Thatcher made the famous remark that "Northern Ireland is as British as Finchley".
The documents were released from the Irish Prime Minister’s office under the 30-year rule and reveal that the Irish officials were pushing for a three-strand resolution which aimed to focus on North/South and British/Irish dimensions including cross-community relations within Northern Ireland.
The suggested model would eventually form the basis of the Good Friday Agreement, 18 years later.
At the time the British government were focused on establishing a devolved administration based in Belfast which Dublin could co-operate with a North/South basis.
"The destiny of the people of Northern Ireland will have to be decided by them alone," said Mr Atkins.
Mr Lenihan was apparently frustrated by Mr Akins’ remarks, who voiced “serious doubts” about his plans and maintained that Britain could not “abstract itself” from the situation at hand.
15 - 48 | See all comments
- The New York Times questions Ireland’s highly-p
- Bah! Humbug! The ten worst things about Christm
- Spanish judge slams Ryanair’s sexist air...
- Racist incidents in Ireland up by 85 percent...
- Gay wedding cakes latest target of anti-gay...
- No Irish prosecution for man named as world’s...
- Offensive NFL sign outside restaurant just...
- Ireland crowned “Top Tourist Destination”...
- Irish radio presenter suspended after anti-Isra
- How the Irish celebrate Christmas has changed...
There is no barrier for any person legally in Ireland to takiong on any job they are willing and capable to work at. To suggest there is some capitalIrish outrage over NY Times pigeon-eating and desperate economic times article
Mass Immigrationists like barry exemplify the double speak and dishonesty that underlies the capitalists' project to replace the young men and women oTop ten words the Irish use that confuse Americans
To be fair, most American words and slang came FROM Ireland to begin with. I plan to visit Ireland and learn as much as possible. Can't wait.New Northern Ireland flag is not an option, loyalists tell Richard Haass
I think we have enough flags in Ireland as it is.