News


Irish the ‘forgotten white slaves’ says expert John Martin

Ireland was the greatest victim of British slave trade he says


White sugar slaves photographed in Barbados
White sugar slaves photographed in Barbados
Photo by Snippets and Slappits

Guinness PubFinder Ad

The history of the African slave trade into the America’s is one that is well-documented as well as largely taught in American schools today.

However, as John Martin of the Montreal-based Center for Research and  Globalization points out in his article ‘The Irish Slave Trade - The Forgotten ‘White’ Slaves,’ it was not just Africans who were traded as slaves.

Indeed, the Irish have a gruesome history as being traded as slaves as well and subjected to similar and sometimes worse treatment than their African contemporaries of the time.

Strangely though, the history of Irish and ‘white’ slavery is by and large ignored in the American educational curriculum today.

In his article, John Martin writes “The Irish slave trade began when James II sold 30,000 Irish prisoners as slaves to the New World. His Proclamation of 1625 required Irish political prisoners be sent overseas and sold to English settlers in the West Indies. By the mid 1600s, the Irish were the main slaves sold to Antigua and Montserrat. At that time, 70 percent of the total population of Montserrat were Irish slaves.”

Read more articles on Irish history here

“Ireland quickly became the biggest source of human livestock for English merchants. The majority of the early slaves to the New World were actually white.”

Martin writes how at the hands of the British, the Irish population plummeted due to the slave trade of the 17th century.

“During the 1650s, over 100,000 Irish children between the ages of 10 and 14 were taken from their parents and sold as slaves in the West Indies, Virginia and New England. In this decade, 52,000 Irish (mostly women and children) were sold to Barbados and Virginia. Another 30,000 Irish men and women were also transported and sold to the highest bidder. In 1656, [Oliver] Cromwell ordered that 2000 Irish children be taken to Jamaica and sold as slaves to English settlers.”

Martin goes on to explain that for some reason, the Irish slaves are often remembered as ‘indentured servants.’ However, in most cases during the 17th and 18th centuries, they were no more than “human cattle.”

“...the African slave trade was just beginning during this same period,” writes Martin. “It is well recorded that African slaves, not tainted with the stain of the hated Catholic theology and more expensive to purchase, were often treated far better than their Irish counterparts.”

During the late 1600s, writes Martin, African slaves were far more expensive than their Irish counterparts - Africans would sell for around 50 sterling while Irish were often no more than 5 sterling.

Further, the treatment of Irish slaves was thought to be more cruel than that of African slaves. If an Irish slave was beaten by their owner, it wasn’t considered to be a crime.


See more: Irish Roots
Nster.com


66 Comments

15 - 66 | See all comments

The reason that the Irish are often treated as indentured servants is because, when the practice of enslaving them prevailed, slavery, for Irish and African alike, was forced indenturement; one was a slave only for a set period (usually 7 years) & then was set free. Slavery wasn't for life, nor were one's children automatically born into slavery. That why there was a small population of free African-Americans in the American South; the earliest African slaves were freed after their period of slavery, & some went on to become slave-owners themselves. By the time perpetual slavery was introduced towards the end of the 18th century, the slave trade had shifted exclusively to Africans; as the article points out, they commanded a higher price.
The Black death decimated the Normans in Ireland. The Dalcassian Tribes survived it because they did not trade with the Normans. What traces of Normans that remained after the Black Death mostly Joined the Irish. I dont see this as any different to what Cromwell pulled on the Irish. The Irish have adapted to it. The Irish Fought back and won most of the Irish Island back like it did against the Normans. Now it has the Highest birthrate in Europe and in Northern Ireland there could be a referendum triggered if Enough Irish Migrate North and the Birthrate stays on Track. The main problem though is that the British-Irish in the republic seem to be about 50000 and have a vote that could influence the referendum. What! I still think most of the people will vote in Favor of it once a majority rule is established in the Province. This is when the Likes of Oliver Cromwell will show up again in the History Books. It could be the same in Scotland. Nobody could stop the Anglo Sphere in Iraq or Afghanistan, so the Irish will have to adapt big time and be ready. Its a pity Defense is so GDP dependent. All those old British Empire links still remain and the Irish regularly get affected by this. Its still like Chess over there meanwhile we ponder Tsun Tzu and how it applies to us Dalcassians. We shall Return.
lwts not forget how the cath group christian brotehrs enslaved children in orphanages and reform schools. A good day was a day without a beating or ibeing molested is how a victim summarized it. No woner the church in ireland3is all but dead. Everyone should drop off a bag of those cadaver eating bugs at teh church.
Thanks, WK.
Curtisjohnson: Not for the first time, you have made an interesting point. I had never mentally compared the grievances of Ireland in the late 18th century with those of the American colonies. But now that I think of it you are quite right--we had very little to complain about--a few unfair taxes etc-- compared to what the Irish, especially the Irish Catholics, were suffering. Good post.
What is remarkable is the consensus among terror state “historians” (and self-hating native quislings) that the indigenous people had no justification for rebellions. It’s hard to imagine what additional atrocities the terror state could have perpetrated throughout the centuries to legitimize all forms of resistance – ethnic and cultural cleansing, slavery, manufactured famines, the most brutal forms of torture, the rape and breeding of children, etc. Compare these to the relatively mild grievances which are commonly used to justify the American revolution and one can see the master race psychosis at the root of the anglo view of Irish history.
There is one mistake. James VII/II was not born yet. The proclamation would have been signed by his great grandfather and namesake, James VI/I in 1625. Also the proclamation in question,, I believe was signed some years earlier. Irish were being shipped over to the New World as slaves as early as 1608 in the aftermath of the Flight of the Earls in November 1607and the beginning of the plantation system which systematically removed them from their property and given to English and Scottish Presbyterians. It was, nevertheless, another chapter in the long expanse of Ireland's ugly interaction with the English.
@DublinJoyrider. With all due respect Im not sure if your comment is sarcasm in comical terms. If its not, then your own words, fictional myth applies.Regarding Monserrat,its very disrespectful for any who apportion blame on the victims of British brutality.The white Irish slaves and their surrounding circumstances ,inflicted by Cromwell are not a myth.Britain have long tried to hide their shameful actions against all by censorship etc. Many of their atrocities against Ireland were blamed on the Irish or were justified as British working in our country,s best interest
Dublin - you are incoherent.
The anglo-british terror state should have to pay reparations like their nazi cousins – only the anglo crimes span generation after generation
“Comparing what might have been done in 600 or 700 A.D. with what The English did in Ireland in the 1600's” Anglo slavery was by most measures more barbaric and sadistic than slavery in antiquity – particularly in comparison to the average life expectancy and lifestyle of a Roman slave. In addition to its supremacist bent, anglo slavery was focused on routine and sadistic torture often performed for entertainment of the anglo-planter sickos. Moreover, anglo slavery was done under the auspices of a purportedly Christian outlook which prohibited slavery on its own mainland (while at the same time the Anglican “Church” actually owned, bred, and branded slaves) – therefore sophistic arguments about temporal relativism ring hollow.
Tom: Welll there you go again, always rationalizing it away. Comapring what might have been done in 600 or 700 A.D. with what The English did in Ireland in the 1600's. You point out one or two examples that may or may not have happened in those ancient times, and comapre it with Cromwell's attempts to wipe out the Irish people. Yep, you are Irish, but stil sniveling at the feet of the English.
Tom: Welll there you go again, always rationalizing it away. Comapring what might have been done in 600 or 700 A.D. with what The English did in Ireland in the 1600's. You point out one or two examples that may or may not have happened in those ancient times, and comapre it with Cromwell's attempts to wipe out the Irish people. Yep, you are Irish, but stil sniveling at the feet of the English.
Curtis, Bad as things are today, the past was even worse. I'm optimistic largely courtesy of that long arc of history bending toward justice. In the cosmic view of things, each individual who weathers the storm and manages to place even one grain of sand on the beach has won his/her part of the battle. Alone we are weak; together we can overcome. As Michael Moore is fond of reminding the world, there are far more of us than there are of them. The Occupy movement overall shows promise, especially OccupyMarines. Good grief, I even know lifelong diehard pacifists increasingly ready to pick up a stone. That's why I'm so in favor of political means when possible, because a conflagration once set is impossible to contain. Violent revolution, while historically almost inevitable at a certain tipping point, always 'eats its children'.
Sorry - accidental repost. I agree Meanolgrouch but I am less optimistic than you because some many are blind to the nature of the regimes they live in.




Log into IrishCentral with your Facebook account


or sign-in directly

E-Mail:
Password:
 Remember me Forgot my password
Not a member? Register Now!
print this article Print
email this articleE-mail