News


Irish couple begin challenge over same sex marriage - historic case en route to the High Court

Couple who married in Canada continue fight to have their marriage recognized under Irish law


Dr Ann Louise Gilligan and Senator Katherine Zappone pictured with Irish President Michael D Higgins
Dr Ann Louise Gilligan and Senator Katherine Zappone pictured with Irish President Michael D Higgins
Photo by Senator Katherine Zappone

Guinness PubFinder Ad

An Irish doctor and a senator are taking a case to the High Court to fight for their same-sex marriage to be identified under Irish law.

Common law partners Dr Ann Louise Gilligan and Senator Katherine Zappone will issue fresh legal proceedings as part of their long term battle to have their Canadian marriage recognized under Irish law, the Irish Times reports.

The case will test the provisions of the Civil Registration Act 2004, which defines marriage as being between a man and a woman,  and the Civil Partnership Act 2010, who prohibits people who have registered a civil partnership from marrying.

The couple, who have been together for 30-years married in British Columbia, Canada, in 2003.

Last October they launched an unsuccessful Supreme Court appeal against the Civil Registration Act 2004.

"It became clear to us that, even if we succeeded with our original case, the provisions within the Civil Registration Act and the Civil Partnership Act would remain. So it became imperative to shelve our Supreme Court appeal and proceed to challenge this Act before the High Court,"  Zappone told the Irish Times.

"We have been at this for almost ten years, looking for the right to marry the person we love. All we want is the right to marry under the Irish constitution," she said.

Dr Gilligan added: "We hold hope and believe that this is the right step towards a positive outcome.”

"We remain steadfast in this journey."

Kieran Rose of the Gay and Lesbian Equality Network (GLEN) welcomed the announcement.

“Civil marriage, building on the comprehensive civil partnership legislation, is the next incremental step in achieving equality for lesbian and gay couples," he told the newspaper.

"While civil partnership provides legal protections equal to civil marriage in a wide range of areas, including in social welfare, taxation, inheritance and immigration, civil marriage is the only option that would provide for full Constitutional equality with opposite-sex couples,” he added.


Nster.com


5 Comments

See all comments

The sexually confused people who don't comprehend that men are suppossed to have sex with women and women with men, will never stop trying until they force the rest of us to accept their sexual perversions. This couple could have kept their strange behaviour behind closed doors, but they are not satisfied with that. They want humanity to regard them as a normal couple in contrast to what has been ordained for us by our Creator. In the Bible it says that G-D created Adam and Eve to come together sexually and have children. He did not create Adam and Steve so they could have abnormal and unnatural sex and produce no off-spring.
Well, for two intelligent women I am surprised that they beg for permission like they are not free sovereign beings? Why would they want to have a third party in their marriage- the patriarchal state- and if they want to divorce, they will have to be good little girls and ask permission.Bless the old days in Eire when we married and divorced without any church or state CONTRACTS.The state love contracts, so if you wise ladies want to contract yourselves to the male patriarchal system, go right ahead. Otherwise keep your money and enjoy life.
You're dead right, SeanMor, and pay no heed to the specious speculations of hollaback. If the government needs to get out of the bedroom and stop regulating who can marry, then it's high time it stopped prohibiting freely consenting men and women who happen to be siblings or parent/child from marrying. Hollaback's claim is actually shown to be false by a story about two consenting adults (father/daughter, I think) that's been running on IrishCentral for weeks. In case of misunderstanding, I should state,and I suspect SeeanMor agrees with me, that I believe that governments do have a right to impose controls on the institution of matrimony, since marriage is above all a civic and legal relationship. Have sex with whoever you like, hollaback, mon, pop or sis, but don't expect society to recognize that as a valid marriage.
You're drawing a false analogy, Seanmor. That's like saying if they grant same sex marriage what's next, space travel? You're deliberately confusing an attraction with an orientation. The vast majority of incest is non-consensual. It only has a different name from rape, because both words were formed in a time when rape was considering “using” a father or husband’s property against his will. I would look on any comparison between homosexuality and incest as pretty obvious trolling because it’s deliberately using the fact that almost all reported incest comes under the heading of sexual abuse with family access being just a method to accomplish the abuse.
Even if the same-sex couple are denied the right to marry in the highest court in the Irish state, they may win their case as a human rights issue in the Strasbourg Court. Whatever the ultimate outcome of this case, one is left to wonder if incestuous couples should also have a legal right to marry.
 




Log into IrishCentral with your Facebook account


or sign-in directly

E-Mail:
Password:
 Remember me Forgot my password
Not a member? Register Now!
print this article Print
email this articleE-mail