A Wicklow woman has begun legal action against the Washington Post-owned website Slate.com, which she claims defamed her in an article about a Jordanian terrorist.
A high court judge in Ireland gave her permission to commence the libel suit in Ireland because the article was published worldwide.
In 1986, Anne Murphy, now living in Wicklow, unknowingly carried bombs placed by her boyfriend in her suitcase aboard a flight from London to Israel. She was heavily pregnant at the time.
Slate.com wrote that “When the girlfriend of Jordanian terrorist Nizar Hindawi tried to carry a bomb onto an El Al flight out of London’s Heathrow airport in 1986, security agents working for the Israeli airline and using Israeli screening methods successfully identified her as a potential threat and foiled the plot.”
Her lawyer Iain Montgomery said the article on Israeli security at airports stated: “Israeli security screeners can make a claim that their US counterparts probably can’t - they’ve actually caught a terrorist red-handed.”
___________________
READ MORE:
Emigrant Irish flock back home as Christmas day approaches
Finding loved ones before Christmas after decades apart
How the Pogues ‘Fairytale of New York’ almost wasn't made - SEE VIDEO
__________________
Murphy, who is now living in Bray, was granted leave by Dublin’s High Court to serve a claim for damages.
The Irish Examiner reports that Murphy’s legal team believe she was defamed in the internet posting on a site controlled by the Washington Post media group.
The alleged article appeared on the website Slate.com in a posting described in court as a "cyber tort."
Her lawyer claimed the article published on the site last January referred to Murphy.
At the time of the publication Murphy was the girlfriend of Nizar Hindawi who had been referred to in the article as a Jordanian terrorist.
In an affidavit, Montgomery said that he believed the article meant that Ann Murphy was a terrorist and that she attempted to bomb an airline flight.
“Neither of these statements is true and I have advised my client that the article therefore constitutes a defamatory statement,” Montgomery told the court.
“The article was available to access within Ireland on the slate.com website and Mrs Murphy had personally done so.
“As the article was published in Ireland, Mrs Murphy’s action was founded on a tort committed within the jurisdiction, allowing the court to grant leave to serve a summons out of the jurisdiction.”
Montgomery also stated that the intended defendant, The Washington Post Company, was a limited liability company registered in Delaware, USA, with its registered executive offices at 15th Street, N.W. Washington, D.C.
The Examiner reports that he said the witnesses to the contents, publication and untruth of the statements contained in the article were all resident in Ireland and as such Ireland was the jurisdiction in which the intended action be heard.
Judge Gerard Hogan said that since the article was published world wide the proceedings could be described as a cyber tort. He added that what he was dealing with was a simple procedural matter of being satisfied as to allow the summons to be issued outside the jurisdiction.
7 Comments
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Switch to the desktop site to post a comment.joycean | Dec 26, 2011, 10:58 AM EST
Slate shows a correction was made to the article on Nov.11,2011.
pjmacmanus | Dec 25, 2011, 01:44 PM EST
She must have been pretty dim to allow someone else, even her lover, to pack her suitcase. I think that bogsidebunny might have it right, save your money and spend it where one is appreciated, not reviled and treated as a cash cow.
joycean | Dec 25, 2011, 08:27 AM EST
It is very unlikely this would be allowed in the US. In my Satae,lawyers can be fined for frivolous suits, so probably no one would be willing to touch this. Libel is not usually done on a contingency basis: the lawyer would want payment up front which would amount to hundreds - thousands of dollars that she would have to pay first. Libel also requires the accuser show exactly how she was harmed:how much money did she lose as a result. Most of the time, all an accuser would get would be a sentence in the newspapers "Corrections."
seanomelbourne | Dec 25, 2011, 02:45 AM EST
Newspapers are sued in America and just about every other west.nation
wyalusingjohn | Dec 24, 2011, 08:43 PM EST
I don't think you can ask a person to have some Christmas spirit and in the same sentence call them that name. The chances of suing a newspaper in the US for libel is nil. Much different laws, thank god
seanomelbourne | Dec 24, 2011, 06:22 PM EST
have some christmas spirit bogside you mean spirited A hole
SeamusMor | Dec 24, 2011, 02:58 PM EST
It was clearly establish in the public's mind that Ann Murphy was an unknowing victim of the terrorist's plot, along with all the other passengers, crew, and possibly those on the ground as well. It was Nizar Hindawi, not Ann Murphy, who was caught red handed. Case dismissed!