News


Gerry Adams pushes for united Ireland referendum in US speech

Says Irish American help was key to success of peace process


Gerry Adams speaking this year at the Sinn Fein Ard Fheis in Killarney
Gerry Adams speaking this year at the Sinn Fein Ard Fheis in Killarney
Photo by Alan Betson/The Irish Times

Guinness PubFinder Ad

A referendum on a united Ireland will be a major part of the Sinn Fein strategy going forward, Sinn Fein leader Gerry Adams told an American audience last night.

Putting the united Ireland issue to a referendum test would help mobilise support for the issue over the long run, Adams said, and he stated he believed there was major backing.

He cited the issue of Scotland where a similar referendum is planned and stated that the United Kingdom was in imminent danger of break-up.

Over 600 students and interested Irish Americans gathered at Quinnipiac University in Hamden, Connecticut to hear Adams on Tuesday night.

Adams was in town to help celebrate the opening of the new Great Hunger museum on campus and he referred to the harsh times that emigrants fleeing the Famine faced when they arrived in America.

He talked of a bridge in Donegal entitled the “bridge of tears,” so called because young men and women crossing that bridge which led to the emigrant boat knew they would never come back.
He stated that what the Irish emigrants faced when they landed in Canada and the U.S was unbelievable today.

But he stated that what the Irish endured and lived through during the Famine proved that “we are no mean people” he said.

He stated that the support for Irish freedom in America  from the Fenians, through the 1916 Rising right down to the present day, was a vital part of Irish history.

He stated that the move to have President Bill Clinton involved had come from Irish America and that it had changed the American perspective for ever.

The decision to grant him a visa to come to the U.S. in 1994 had overturned hundreds of years of British and American agreement that Ireland was a wholly British issue to deal with.

He stated that the current financial crisis was caused by bankers and developers who had almost bankrupted the country. Sinn Fein was the only party prepared to stand up for the little guy he stated.


Nster.com


107 Comments

15 - 107 | See all comments

OVER HERE IN IRELAND HIS CAREER HAS GOTTTEN HOM NOWHERE... I REALLY THINK AS HE SHOULD MOVE OVER THERE TO AMERICA AS HE SEEMS TO BE VERY POPULAR WITH THE MILLIONS OF AMERICANS WHO THINK THEIR IRISH .. JUST BECAUSE THEIR GREAT GRANNYS AUNT MOVED TO AMERICA FROM HERE 100 YEARS AGO ... IT MAKE ME LAUGH ...HAHA
Ancavker. Thats correct. But no one can deny the lamblasting the SDLP took from SF over their support for the same. Traitors, sell-outs and many other names were attributed to them by the party who has actually settled for less.
adams and his gang are fu*king marxists, nuf said
How about this guys... Screw Adams and screw any armed militia. Leave it to the people to decide! We all have a vote, we don't need guns. Few people are asking for a referendum. When and if the people want it there will be one.
Sunningdale- Adams was biggest critic. He has now accepted a similar deal after 2000 deaths
seamus: Sunningdale could have been implementd, if the British had the backbone to stand up to the Unionists; they of course did not.And sadly had they stood behond it an implemented it, much of the suffering and violence that cam after, might have been prevented.
Just imagine if Gerrys pretend wish was granted. Doesn`t bear thinking about. After all these big conspiricies not ever being able to dent his armour, he`d have to sit at the back of the class like the dunce he is because of his own big mouth. LOL
Gearoid4. We all know when the Hunger strike was and we all now know why and how Adams and the kitchen cabinet allowed the last 6 men to die. He weaned the life out of those men for his new found resolve and direction.The one he caught hold of the morning Bobby Sands funeral had a turn out of proportions he had never imagined.Even at the time of lead up to the peace process vols on the ground were afforded no input to something they were unaware of. Had they been, many of them could have packed up and gone home if they so wished.Thats hardly bringing republicans on board in some sort of democrecy. Anyway the crux is we have got now what was on offer over 2000 lives back with the differance being Hume instead of Adams. Nothing to do with a Free Ireland. Its better known as Sunningdale for slow learners. We now have gerrymandering against Catholics in North Belfast at the hands of Adams party, we still have internment that the marchers on Bloody Sunday were protesting against yet Adams party don`t do protests anymore. Though they do endorse informing to the enemy on Irish Republicans who have not decented from the proclamation and its objectives. Treason is still treason.
I'mi not defending Gerry Adam's overall record,but he did set out to take the Republican movement down a different path from the period of the 1980's. He realized that a pure military strategy was never going to achieve the unity of the country and resolved to wean his colleagues off a militant one-track policy. Of course, we can list the atrocities committed by the IRA and the human suffering was terrible. But the peace strategy advocated firstly by John Hume, got Adams and most of the Republican movement on board, which culminated in the Good Friday Agreement in 1998. I'm not hear to canonise Gerry Adams, but his advocacy of a UI is still a valid and achievable objective. You say that it could have been achieved decades ago. What proof do you have of this, in the face of the evidence which shows unionist resistance to any concessions to the Irish Catholic community in the north?
Gearoid4. You just can`t wash away all the suffering that has taken place and is still taking place by pouring false praise on some one like Adams who` makes out HE got you something, when it was there for the taking off the table decades earlier. Lets all praise some one for prolonging a war, long enough to build themselves a reputation as a statesman and all the rewards that come with it. Next you`ll be saying that Wilford should be allowed to keep his OBE or whatever he was awarded for his mens actions on Bloody Sunday.
All those who berate Gerry Adams and think that the north's political situation will stay as it is for ever and a day, should check out the possible ramifications of a Scotland-free UK in 2014. It will have undoubted repercussions for the north and it will open an window of opportunity for those who aspire to an UI. As the former tory UK PM Harold MxcMillan once said in relation to things which effect change in politics-"Events, dear boy..Events".
Gordon. You have to admit though that SF could not have entered the political arena in the 26 at a better time. Since the formation of the 26 its been scandal after scandal as rotating parties left terms in government. More so in recent decades due to the nature of mordern media. Most recently because of the world economic rip off on the people. The worst as it has entered into peoples living rooms and pockets. Although not all to blame the Gov of the day for... people do. Why not vote for SF they can `t do any worse for the people than whats gone before them. At the minute all is required is some one good at doing the Talk and a voluntary army to spread it.
Kilsally. The majority of people in the north do not have the power you imply we are mere subjects to be used and abused by back room decision makers. I wouldn`t worry too much either about SF`s tendancies (communist or other) as they have more than the town clock has faces. Find me something from the USA where their litrature has the word Socialist incorporated. The comparison between their policies in the North to that in the South and actions they carry out as Gov in the North to their proposed actions should they get into power in the South have gaps as wide as that from capitalism to communism. They will wear the face to fit the audiance and not break a sweat. If Adams and Mc Guinness inside Stormont having tea and scons with the Isreali Ambassador whilst their own supporters protest outside at the mans very presence on Irish soil doesn`t fizz them what will.
Maryo. He still has to poisture his self failed aspiration in order to keep the few Republicans he can muster on board. After all he hasn`t the head for figures or anything else that isn`t prescripted. Gone are the days when he could always fall back on his tryed and tested rebutal of " you would need to ask THEM yourself". What else has he contributed to date since elected in Louth apart from making Mary lou look the real getting FAT cat when seated next to her.
United Ireland, united w/whom?? England?? The man is delusional who would support him ?




Log into IrishCentral with your Facebook account


or sign-in directly

E-Mail:
Password:
 Remember me Forgot my password
Not a member? Register Now!
print this article Print
email this articleE-mail