Friend reveals that Norris’ former lover denies he is a pedophile
Nawi claims boy he raped told him he was over age of consent
Published Thursday, August 4, 2011, 8:19 AM
Updated Thursday, August 4, 2011, 10:01 AM
6 comments
Return to article
Page 1 of 1 pages
themurphia | Aug 06, 2011, 07:32 AM EDT
dunmanyway8:technically not...*paedophilia* relates to prepubescent children...the correct technical term is *ephebophilia*...!as Norris helpfully clarified in one of his ahem 'academic' discussions...the devil's in the detail apparently...But of course we now know what Nawi knew from his RTE interview as reported in IT i.e that the boy WAS underage and he had not been misled by a 15 year old boy into believing he was of an age to consent...so Norris 'of Counsels' first Ground of Appeal i.e. that his then partner he had entered a guilty plea *unwisely* was slightly at odds with the reality...'Norris of Counsel' should perhaps familiarise himself with the principles of the *First law of Holes*...no pun intended...!
Report abuse
themurphia | Aug 05, 2011, 04:36 AM EDT
ToicfaidhArmani:Where did it say the minor who was 15 at the time incidentally 'tried it on'...? Even if a young person did behave in a inappropriate sexual way it is for the *adult* to behave like a responsible *adult*...or are you saying that men regardless of their sexuality have no scruples when it comes to sex with minors? Are you suggesting this is acceptable...?
Report abuse
TiocfaidhArmani | Aug 05, 2011, 03:30 AM EDT
Oh yeah sure Pittsburgh, you get Miley Cyrus when she was sixteen try it on with a 40 year old man, they would all say no...sssuuuurrreee thing! I'm straight by the way but your comments are a disgrace and deluded.
Report abuse
cillowen | Aug 04, 2011, 11:42 AM EDT
nuff said zionist - Norris’ long term partner Ezra Yishak Nawi has insisted that he did not know the 15-year-old boy he had sex with was underage. Nawi has claimed the Palestinian boy assured him he was over 16, the age of consent in Israel.
Report abuse
themurphia | Aug 04, 2011, 09:12 AM EDT
Ignorance is no defence in law...If in doubt don't do it..It is incumbent on the 'adult' to make sure that the sexual partner is not 'jail bait'...Discrepancy in age is an aggravating feature and one taken into consideration in sentencing...seems like a very lenient sentence for rape of a minor...
Report abuse
Page 1 of 1 pages
- Michelle Obama and daughters trace their...
- Body of Irish immigrant tossed in medical...
- President Obama’s visit to North comes at...
- Former church spokesman criticised for using...
- Daily Mail unloads on 'drunken young' Paddys...
- Sinn Fein deputy leader speaks out against...
- Irish kids receive almost $700 in Holy Communio
- North’s Minister for Finance accuses Republic...
- Shock as Irish priest praises Prime Minister’s.
- President Obama urges all of Northern Ireland...
6 Comments


Report abuse