News


Eamon Gilmore: Five years on devolution in Northern Ireland has worked

Deputy Prime Minister of Ireland speaks out on success of Northern Ireland Executive


Tanaiste Eamon Gilmore
Tanaiste Eamon Gilmore
Photo by Google Images

Guinness PubFinder Ad

On May 8, five years ago, Ian Paisley and Martin McGuinness were nominated and took their pledges as first minister and deputy first minister of a shared Northern Ireland Executive.   Since then, the parties in the Assembly and Executive have been engaged in practical and productive cooperation which has lead to a more stable situation in Northern Ireland than ever before.

This anniversary is a time to reflect on how far we have come, to give due credit to the political parties for the quiet and patient effort which continues to characterize this process, and to consider what must yet be done. 

This is, after all, a process.  There is no finishing line.  The task of building a society that is more cohesive, more reconciled and of course more prosperous is one that must go on.

At one level, the process is characterized by very different objectives.  Speaking in Iveagh House in Dublin last month, First Minister Peter Robinson spoke of his vision for Northern Ireland within the United Kingdom. 

Last week, Deputy First Minister McGuinness reminded an audience in London that his goal is a united Ireland.

Yet all are agreed on the need to first address the significant economic challenges facing us north and south.  We are already working closely together on finding ways to reduce costs, deliver services more effectively and plan ahead – for example in electricity generation.

Where all agree too is on the need to continue efforts towards building a society that is not only at peace but that is truly reconciled.  The establishment of stable political institutions was a critical first step towards that goal. 

But institutions in themselves do not determine the future.  People do.

A stable future in Northern Ireland is one where identity is neither diminished nor a source of division.  Where symbols of pride to one are not a source of anger or hurt to another.

The coming centenaries of events which helped define our political shape and identity for a hundred years will be a test of our determination to “bow to history without being bowed by it.”

We speak of restoring our society to prosperity.  Of course this means restoring our public finances, creating more jobs and rebuilding our international reputation. 

But a prosperous society is not measured solely in financial terms.  A prosperous society is one where difference is not merely tolerated but valued as a source of strength.

As we reflect, throughout the coming decade, on the events of 100 years ago, we should also consider what our legacy will be.

The devolved Assembly and Executive are a remarkable demonstration of what can be achieved when people are willing to set aside their differences and find a common ground for cooperation.

The challenge now is to ensure that the rest of society, and particularly younger people, can build on this.  

Sectarianism has not been eliminated, and it can find a root particularly in those who feel the most marginalized in the current difficult economic climate. It is fundamental that we focus on shaping a future where sectarian thought and prejudice no longer has a hold.


Nster.com


18 Comments

See all comments

Maybe bythebay should find herself a husband(if that is possible)have some kids and stop embarrassing hersalf on this site.
@bytheway you state "The IRA 30 year war of terror was not for shared government, it was for "Brits out" and a "United Ireland". It is obvious that you have no Idea about Irish Republicanism. You have displayed an inability to draw any lessons from our history coupled with an unwillingness to even acknowledge the existence of, let alone engage with, the Éire Nua proposals for a Federal Ireland as a credible and coherent alternative to the present failed partitionist set-up. P.S I agree with sirpeter you are a bit of a winney
It's easy to know when anybody hits a nerve with Bythebay.She doesn't shut up and we are subjected to a string of idiotic comments.I have a mental image of a girl stamping her feet with her hands on her hips and a face like a bulldog licking piss off a nettle!
STEVENSTAIR: It is a fact, were it not for American involvement in the north, there would be no peace in the north, don't try and rewrite history. And the people in the south stood idly by and did nothing. You could not even talk about the north when in the 26 counties. Of course that never prvented the Irish from criticizing the U.S. Your brain is getting fried from that tanning bed.
As an accidental citizen of this arrestedly developed republic, I warmly applaud the Ulster/Northern Ireland Assembly and Executive as a bold experiment in neo-provincial self-governance. As a Leinster/eastern Ireland green unionist (i.e. united Irelander) (and heterodox Christian), I recognise this micro peace process as a shift towards a median power sharing national reintegration of all four ancient historic provinces on "our shared island - our shared Ireland" (Ó h'Uigeann, 2011): Ulster/Northern Ireland - Munster/southern Ireland - Leinster/eastern Ireland and - Connacht/western Ireland. An agreed (provincially federated?) Ireland will facilitate a "partnership of equals" (EIIR, 2011) or macro power sharing with the neighbouring island jurisdiction - an increasingly democratised (and federated?) island of Great Britain - probably within the Commonwealth of Nations. My fellow citizens! After many years of conflict, the Aristotelian golden mean (or Buddhist middle path) has been found with the help of "our exiled children in America" (Pearse, 1916). So, to paraphrase an infamous English republican - political puritans of the islands' main traditions adverse to constructive centrism are cordially invited to go "to hell or to [Timbuctu]!" (Cromwell, 1648).
If not for the IRA campaign in the north there would've been no devolution.Unfortunately the orange bigots had to be blasted to the negotiating table.
IRA Terrorists in Northern Ireland continue to attempt to keep Catholics from joining the PSNI, the Police Service of Northern Ireland, but it won't succeed. Even though Police Constable Ronan Kerr was killed recently by the IRA terrorisrs and a car bomb found under the car of the parents of another Catholic police officer, the desire of the IRA to bully Catholics from participating in all Northern Ireland processes and institutions will fail, just as their 30 years of terrorism failed.
@@@@@@@@@@@ancavker | May 11, 2012, 10:13 AM STEVENSTAR: Lets not forget if it were not for the efforts of President Clinton and George Mitchell, Americans of course, there would be no Good Friday agreement or peace in the north. The Irish in the south stood idly by for all those years, and did nothing!! I guess like yourself, they were too busy using tanning beds.?>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AS AN IRISHMAN BORN IN IRELAND & LIVING IN IRELAND I FIND THAT REMARK OF YOURS INCREDIBLY IGNORANT AND ONCE AGAIN YOUR AMERICAN INTERFERRANCE IS NOT WANTED OVER HERE EITHER NORTH OR SOUTH...SO KEEP OBABMA KEEP CLINTON,KEEP THE KENNEDYS AND YOUR WHOLE PLASTIC LEPRAUCHAUN CULTURE OUT OF OUR AFFAIRS...YOUR AMERICAN GO SORT OUR YOUR OWN COUNTRY'S AFFAIRS AND LEAVE OURS ALONE..
Patrick Counihan, fyi, Ireland doesn't have a Deputy Prime Minister. You're thinking about Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Eamonn Gilmore is Ireland's Tánaiste.
Dr. Ian Paisley received a standing ovation from the audience when he appeared on RTE television here in Ireland in 2009 for his peace efforts in establishing a devolved Government in Northern Ireland.
The IRA 30 year war of terror was not for shared government, it was for "Brits out" and a "United Ireland". Their war of terror didn't succeed. Northern Ireland is still happily part of the United Kingdom.
jerrydonavan-Right on! Don't bother with bythebuttinski -they have just been off their meds for years-no one pays attention to by.....
Bythebay,you clearly have at best a poor understanding of the Good Friday agreement.You say the agreement happened because of the IRA,then you say they lost!If they brought about an a agreement which gave the nationalist/republican side something whgich they did not have before,shared government then I WOULD SUGGEST THAT THEY WON!However I believe that MOST people won ,except of course for the small group of die hards/bigots who only see progress in a won /lost concept i.e. people like yourself.
The Good Friday Agreement happened because of the 30 years of IRA terrorism which Northern Ireland, Ireland and England suffered. The IRA lost . The Agreement required Ireland give up all claims to Northern Ireland.
I don't know about the bowing to history part. Everything else he said was fine.




Log into IrishCentral with your Facebook account


or sign-in directly

E-Mail:
Password:
 Remember me Forgot my password
Not a member? Register Now!
print this article Print
email this articleE-mail