A new book from a Dublin woman's alleged double life as a prostitute could lure young women to "enter the trade," according to the Irish Independent.
'Between the Sheets' is the alleged factual account of a middle-class Dublin woman who embarked on a life of prostitution after she lost her job.
The author, who goes under the pseudonym 'Scarlet O'Kelly,' went into the world's oldest profession to maintain her "comfortable home and family lifestyle in the face of financial collapse."
The publishers, Penguin Ireland, are already claiming it will be one of the "most controversial" books of the year.
They also added that they are satisfied that the woman's account is genuine, saying: "The book claims to be 'an illuminating and explicit account of a year spent working as an escort in middle Ireland, a gripping account of living a double life -- and the high price it exacts."
Even before publication, the book is already raising concerns among those working with prostitutes.
"Prostitution is dangerous and may have health consequences. There is the mental health aspect; you cannot wake up the following day and get on with your life. It is detrimental in so many ways and it is very sad that it still happens," said Nusha Yonkova, Anti-Trafficking Project Co-ordinator with the Immigrant Council of Ireland.
"The author is anonymous. It is not possible to gain a full insight into her life. I think it is a very bad choice (as a book). They have to be accountable for what they are doing.
"The book would be read by young people who may be at an unstable point in their lives and this could act as an encouragement. It is very disappointing that Penguin has done this. I think it is purely to gain profits. It is a poor choice.
"The reality is that there are almost no middle-class, middle-aged women (in prostitution). The reality is that they are predominantly migrants from Eastern and Central Europe, poor central American countries and Africa. There are some Irish women, but the majority of them would also have addiction problems. That is the difference. They would not be people who have choices.
"They are strapped for cash and they need cash to survive and they take that temporary decision to do it for a while. In some cases they are completely controlled, indebted to the people who have falsified the migrant services they have received."
However, the author of the controversial tome is claiming the sex industry was nothing like she expected it to be: "I expected it to be seedy and awful and it wasn't."
She said that during her time as an escort and prostitute, she had had sex with more than 150 men.
But according to the Migrant Council of Ireland, the reality is very different from what is portrayed in the book.
Former Garda Detective Superintendent PJ Browne said that while he had not read the book, he was concerned about any impression that might be given that prostitution was a "safe" or "lifestyle" choice.
"We found that a large number of young women working in prostitution were from very poor backgrounds and from countries where they could get no work. It is sordid and it is dangerous. I have no idea what experiences this woman had, but the vast majority of women working in this trade in Ireland are young foreign women who are desperate for money," said the detective, who has led an investigation into Dublin's vice trade.
"They are very vulnerable, both from the aspects of pimps and men who can exploit them, and from dangerous customers.
"Our main concern was for the safety of these young women and to ensure that there was a stop to trafficking and exploitation. Many said they were working voluntarily, and that may be the case, but there are dangers inherent in this work.
"Poor Belinda Periera (the 27-year-old Sri Lankan-born prostitute murdered at an apartment in Liffey Street in Dublin in December 1996) was working alone over the Christmas period in Dublin and met an awful death. It was a very sad life and a terrible death.
"She was working alone in an apartment in a city she knew nothing about. She came over for the Christmas week and was due to go back to London on New Year's Day. Her parents were lovely people who knew nothing of what had happened to their daughter when she had gone to England and that she had been dragged into that type of existence."
Another senior garda concurred that while most of the young foreign women who were involved in lap-dancing clubs and prostitution were here voluntarily, there were concerns among them and among gardai for their safety.
"There is no question but that this can be very dangerous work for young women," he said.
8 Comments
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Switch to the desktop site to post a comment.SingleDonald | Feb 01, 2012, 09:01 AM EST
Curitiba, I like horse racing & card playing!!
IrelandNorth | Feb 01, 2012, 07:58 AM EST
SingleDonald! Are ya shure yer not Daniel O'Donnell? The world's olderst profession. After politics, that is. And probably more honourable. It's a hard one to call. Sad that something so special is reduce to the status of a cash nexus. More acceptable if voluntary though, surely?
Curitiba | Jan 31, 2012, 03:02 PM EST
Thanks, SingleDonald. I think there are a lot of things are are legal that people might think are "sleazy", such as gambling and drinking, (both were banned at one time)but others don't and it is better that these things are controlled by the authorities than criminals, because they will take place anyway, whether you ban them or not.
SingleDonald | Jan 30, 2012, 07:23 PM EST
Good points, Curitiba! I posted earlier on this subject, and pointed out how a legal heterosexual male prostitute, in Nevada, told a female reporter how he had been neglected by his mom, when a young boy. Your plan would solve most of prostitution's social ills. Yet, I wonder if we should legalize something which is sleazy in itself? Something like this should be given freely, from the heart! I know that some guys are only looking for a "romp in the hay", with no emotional sentiments, So, for them, I guess legalized prostitution would be beneficial. Concerning the hookers, I wonder if living this life, even with legalized safeguards in place, is realy a positive lifestyle, considering the emotional baggage they likely carry? There are pros & cons to this argument, which are very difficult to decide on!
Curitiba | Jan 30, 2012, 05:20 PM EST
Well, the answer is to legalise brothels, tax the pimps and prostitutes, introduce health and safety legislation to protect the health of the sex workers, and allow them to form unions. That will keep the organised criminals out of the game and put a stop to people trafficking.
SingleDonald | Jan 30, 2012, 11:17 AM EST
The "World's Oldest Profession" should not be glamorized! There are severe pitfalls for prostitutes AND johns! For the prostitutes: Being beaten/shortchanged by the pimp; Having to deal with unstable men; Venereal diseases; Arrests by police; Possible drug addiction. For the johns: Being robbed and beated by the pimp; Having the girl run away with his wallet, while he is in the motel room bathroom, BEFORE any services are performed; Venereal diseases; Arrests by police; Developing a "love interest" in an often hired hooker. The last sounds absurd, I realize. However, there is always the chance that, if a guy pays the same girl, for frequent trysts, he may fall in love with her. The feelings would almost never be reciprocated. If the hooker has any values (not likely) she would tell her loving customer to look for affection elsewhere, or (miracle) leave the life of a prostitute and take up with him, legitimately. Then, consider the plight of human trafficing. I first learned about this 10 years ago, when Newsday (Long Island paper) ran a 4-part series on the subject. This is human degradation, to an extreme, and no man should want to be part of it!!
cillowen | Jan 30, 2012, 10:51 AM EST
its a job and now that the tiger has nothing in its tank morality wise, keep watching rte programming for real shiite.
ReturnedYank | Jan 30, 2012, 10:39 AM EST
I wouldn't give credence to anything the "Irish" Independent prints. That's why I stopped reading this article after the first paragraph. Sorry.