News


Bloody Sunday inquiry must include Martin McGuinness’ role as IRA leader says Peter Robinson

If inquiry must go ahead then McGuinness must face questioning


Martin McGuinness
Martin McGuinness
Photo by Google Images

Guinness PubFinder Ad

If the actions of the British Army on Bloody Sunday are to be investigated by the North's police force, then Martin McGuinness' role on the day must be investigated too the North's First Minister Peter Robinson said on Thursday.

According to the Independent, the Deputy First Minister was an IRA leader in Derry in January 1972 when the shootings happened leading Robinson to ask: 'How could you avoid an inquiry into that and say that we're going to have an inquiry into the Army personnel that were there? The Deputy First Minister has openly admitted that he was in charge. If that was the case then there has to be an investigation if you're investigating the Army.'

McGuinness recently won political points from many in the unionist community for publicly shaking the Queen's hand in a gesture of reconciliation.

The Saville report into Bloody Sunday confirmed the innocence of the thirteen men shot dead by the British paratroopers but it also claimed that McGuinness gave the wrong information about his movements that day.

The report concluded he was probably carrying a machine gun but did not engage in 'any activity that provided any of the soldiers with any justification for opening fire.' A fourteenth victim of the paratroopers died several months later.

Responding to the Robinson's call for a counter investigation McGuinness said: 'Lord Saville was very clear in his report into Bloody Sunday that the IRA had no responsibility for what happened on that day. I consider comments from unionist politicians today in the wake of the decision of the PSNI to investigate the events of Bloody Sunday as an attempt to divert attention away from the actions of the Parachute Regiment on that day. It is clear that they do not want to see the Paras investigated for murder.'

Bloody Sunday was called 'unjustified and "unjustifiable' by British Prime Minister David Cameron as he unveiled the report into the controversial shootings. Lord Saville concluded that all the civil rights protesters shot dead were innocent and the soldiers opened fire in the mistaken belief that they were under threat.

The findings from the Saville Inquiry cannot be used as evidence in the new police probe, however.

Some unionist politicians have said they are furious with the Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) Matt Baggot's decision to open an investigation, are in response are demanding that the inquiry be widened to include the murders of two RUC officers shot dead by the IRA in Derry just days before Bloody Sunday. One of the gunmen involved reportedly used a sub-machine gun.

Kate Nash, whose nineteen year old brother William was among the Bloody Sunday victims, told the Independent that the relatives were still seeking justice.

'We never asked for an (Saville) inquiry,' Nash told the press. 'We always asked for prosecutions because my brother was an innocent victim. They were all innocent.'


Nster.com


29 Comments

See all comments

Really Dano you've wasted thousands of words defending your anti-Irish views.
either truth and justice is sought for all the victims or a line should be drawn under the past - currently seems to be a mish mash of both with a heirachy of victims. sinn fein have struggled so much in order to have terrorists who have blown up shops and civilians and been blown up themselves whilst planting the bombs to be classified as victims that they have had to say that the notorious loyalist shankill butchers, who kidnapped random catholics and skinned them before killing them, are also victims
Seano - Unlike you, I don't defend the indefensible...
I have no British army mates.Maybe you should call bloody sunday "summary justice",you've got to stop throwing stones in that orange tinted glasshouse the shattering glass has somehow dimmed your brain.
I'm not disputing the events of Bloody Sunday...merely pointing out the difference in your attitude depending on whose on trial...not to mention any defendants rights before and during a trial...NB that's a trial as opposed to the summary 'justice' favoured by your mates....
Given that the Northern Ireland Assembly adjourned for their summer recess, can't help wondering if the 6 county neo-provincial administration aren't doing what their 26 county proto-republic comparators have been doing for some time. That is, firing a few salvos across the bows of their respective oppositions in the game of parliamentatry democracy to keep the media fed, so as to tide them over the holiday period.
It is strange that the statement by Cardinal Daly, that he witnessed the actual shooting of a young man and that on going to his assistance, with others, had to tell a person with a handgun close by to 'stop shooting. your drawing fire down on us' or words to that effect. This was screened on local television during a debate on the Bloody Sunday shootings in the 1970's. I saw no reference to this incident in the recent £192 million lawyer fest. I wonder why?
Well said lecorri, obviously the massive report of Justice Saville and his international associates means nothing to some of those in Stormont and reading IC. Jacersagain - free speech! I was responding to another comment I disagreed with! I will not be dictated to by you if people make a comment I disagree with I will comment! Again we are talking about murders on the streets of derry where british military acted! the circumstances are to be investigated! Pretty sure it will go the same way as stalker! But the issue is not Martin - it is the PARAS!
No one (except you of course)have no doubt that innocent civilians were murdered on bloody sunday.The only problem is your bloody mindless drivel.
Explain??
You have trouble reading Dano, as usual you go off half cocked and fail to understand what I have said, typical I suppose.
seano can't wait for any trial I see...he's set himself up as judge and jury...how different from his 'wait for the verdict' stance when his chums are on trial?
Well hell, if young Peter wants this investigation, surely he will be just fine with adding an investigation of Paisley, no?
jacersagain. I have stated my opinion on republican millitary action many times. That carries no where near the same protection for me as those who share my opinion and tow the party line. Gerry Mc Geough is against violence, look where he is. Instead of questioning my perspective, should you and others not be questioning the party leadership on the issues mentioned in my last post. Its some indictment for any so called republicans to be administering oppressive and undemocratic actions against any one, in view of what started the troubles in the first place. You are facillitating the myth that is allowed to accompany the process, the myth that nothing is as important as the peace itself. Peace is great, but we had that along with gerrymandering etc etc in 1968. Now its only differant suits administering it for the same brit regime.
seamus60: you're way off track. Please get back on the rails of peace. Ditto maireadinmelb.




Log into IrishCentral with your Facebook account


or sign-in directly

E-Mail:
Password:
 Remember me Forgot my password
Not a member? Register Now!
print this article Print
email this articleE-mail