News


Bill O’Reilly backs Marco Rubio immigration reform as fair and good

Playing catch up on the administration with a sharp change of tactics


Bill O'Reilly appears on the Fox News show, "The O'Reilly Factor,"
Bill O'Reilly appears on the Fox News show, "The O'Reilly Factor,"
Photo by Jeff Christensen/ AP

Guinness PubFinder Ad

Bill O'Reilly may want to turn the administration's strengths into weaknesses by embracing issues that the GOP have traditionally opposed.

In a move that raised eyebrows on Wednesday, O’Reilly gave his blessing to Marco Rubio’s immigration plan throwing his support behind the Florida senator on his Fox News show.

'That seems to be pretty fair,' O’Reilly reportedly said of Rubio’s plan. 'I like your program. I think it’s fair.'

According to Politico, O’Reilly then suggested Rubio take his plan to the president in the hope of a public discussion.

'If the president of the United States is not going to cooperate with the opposing party, we need to report that,' O’Reilly said. 'That’s going to be very, very, very important going forward, because we all want fairness and I think your program is a good one.'

The first phase of Rubio’s plan would deport all undocumented immigrants who have committed serious crimes. It also calls for undocumented immigrants who have committed no crimes to come forward and be fingerprinted for national security, where they will be asked to pay back taxes and are certain to be determined fines.

The second phase comes after the undocumented individual has remained in the US for a significant period of time without committing any crimes - and the border and workplace is secure. Now the legal immigrant would be granted the opportunity to apply for the existing legal immigration system.

It's a staggered path to legal immigration that some critics say is far too provisional on a series of easily altered rules. Rubio says there is no reason to doubt his sincerity, however.

'I wish we didn’t have eight or 12 million people here that are undocumented, but we do and we have to deal with it,' Rubio told O'Reilly on his show. 'But we have to deal with it in a way that’s compassionate and responsible.'

Rubio is a particular Tea Party favorite and is spoken of as a likely 2016 White House contender. Republican party leaders see him as a rising star and hope he could broaden the party’s appeal among Latinos, the nation's fastest growing population.

Meanwhile according to the Washington Post, the Obama administration sees signs that bipartisan cooperation could be possible on immigration reform, in light of Rubio's involvement.

White House press secretary Jay Carney said Rubio’s proposals to offer more visas to highly skilled tech workers and his plan to potentially provide legal status to many many of the nation's 11 million undocumented immigrants 'bode well for a productive, bipartisan debate.'

'We hope that it signals a change in the Republican approach to this issue,' Carney said, 'because if we are going to get this done, it’s going to take more than just a handful of Republicans working across the aisle.'


See more: Irish immigration
Nster.com


6 Comments

See all comments

Rubio has some bright ideas, they should be explored. As to the agricultural workers, let's take a look at the Canadian system. Temp workers are brought into BC and other provinces in a formal govt to govt program, wages and work conditions are monitored and workers seem happy to work hard and be able to support their families back home.
Has Rubio checked his plan out with the agricultural industry in his state. They have little interest in paying legal workers mandated wages or provide mandated benefits. Tey are doing just fine with the illegals, and let's not forget, the general population has a problem not just with the illegals, but also the legals since they are not like 'real Americans.
Why spend ink on looney tune
Senator Mark Rubio's ideas for immigration reform are sound and fair and well within legal practice found in most of the rest of the civilized world. Irish and most legitimate applicants from any country would benefit to a greater extent with this than as past practice. (Just because you heard it on O'Reilly does not make it a bad idea.)
While I have not read Rubio's plan, what is stated in this article seems like a good outline from which to work. Seanmor's clarification of the two catagories of undocumented also would make sense for prioritizing citizenship petitions. The major sticking point in Rubio's and Obama's stated steps that I see is that both vaguely mention a secure border. What does a SECURE border look like in their minds and what must be done to achieve it? I also think that a temporary work permit is important so that our agricultural businesses have a LEGAL way of hiring foreign workers since American workers reject that type of employment. This would reduce the number of people trying to enter illegally, reduce the number of undocumented here and would increase the number on the government's "radar." It is good that we are having an meaningful discussion of this massive problem. Dare we hope that it will lead to similar bipartisan discussions on our many other problems.
No law should be enacted that rewards foreigners for illegally entering and living in the U.S. However, Rubio's plan, which in backed by O'Reil;ly may be a move in the right direction. The above article seems to suggest Yes, illegals who have committed criminal acts should be deported. In assition to fingerprinting these criminals, all other illegals should also be finger-printed (as I was before I joined the marines, and again when I applies for U.S. citizenship). In addition, only those who are flenty in English should be considered for citizenship. Finally, a very clear distinction should be made between those who LAWFULLY entered the country but remained here when their visas expired and those who ILLEGALLY came and Illegally stayed.
 




Log into IrishCentral with your Facebook account


or sign-in directly

E-Mail:
Password:
 Remember me Forgot my password
Not a member? Register Now!
print this article Print
email this articleE-mail