Baggage handlers get a little too intimate with one lady’s ‘personal item’

I think its really funny..but nevertheless, the baggage guy was wrong..loll..I would of laughed at it..I would not even think of bring a vibrator to Ireland..I don't need too..loll Hell, I am going back to Ireland soon..haha..

Bad vibes from the TSA. Should mind their own buzziness.If she's badly stuck, I could modify a Black and Decker jigsaw for her. Should do the trick.

Just a publicity stunt. Never really happened.Why would someone with her looks need an electric poker?

I agree with a fellow correspondent: TMI. I really don't come to this website for this kind of stuff. One more vulgar, off-color piece and I will discontinue. Promise.

Very inappropriate RE: the note in the baggage. People think your business is their business these days.

I would file that under "TMI"....

Is it better to imagine that a gov't agent is inspecting your privates, or to know that they actually are inspecting them? Same goes for your financial affairs, just read thru the American "Bank Secrecy Act"--a classic oxymoron.

Something just does not "smell right" no joke intended with this woman's story. Anyway if I were to guess sounds like she is out for publicity for her website.

Does not seem strange that this article would be written but does seem strange that the "victim" would submit a photo of herself for the article.

Aine, I question the extent of your "abuse of trust" philosophy. I started my State career with the N.Y. State Employment Service. On a couple of occasions, I called a female applicant, on her birthday, to wish her a happy birthday. I used the phone #, and referenced the date of birth she put on her application. I only did so when I had exceptionlly good rapport with a job applicant. Nobody ever complained about this. If they had, I would have resisted any form of "discipline" with all of my might! Women have to "lighten up" when well intentioned guys do things like this, especially if their phone numbers are listed in the directory.

Although this was invasive, as are most TSA searches, Jill's light hearted manner may be a mitigating factor in handing out any discipline to the TSA worker, if he can be identified. Also, since she chose to go public with this, how embarrassed could she really have been? A quiet complaint to TSA would have been taken more seriously. Under the circumstances, if I was a TSA supervisor, I would merely give a verbal warning to the transgressor not to do anything like this again.

Regardless of what the item was that was found, it was an invasion of a travellers right to privacy and an abuse of trust to use on any information you receive in the course of your employment to write any comment (negative or positive) about any of the items you or I have in our suitcase. If an employee cannot or will not see that this is wrong they have bad judgement and could even go so far as to have bad judgement in spreading personal information beyond the realms of their job description. They cannot use the cop out of "It was only a joke".People get hurt by these type of jokes. Plain and simple.

Really??...A woman with a sex drive so strong she can not do without a vibrator on a brief business trip...Maybe I have just been living with my head buried in the sand all these years.

She's a feminist. She hasn't the foggiest idea how to get a man...

Guess she doesn't have much faith in meeting a hot Irish guy if she brought her battery operated boyfriend with her!!!