BBC documentary claims British Artillery fired first shots of Irish Civil War
Memoir throws new light on near century old debate
Published Wednesday, October 31, 2012, 7:36 AM
Updated Wednesday, October 31, 2012, 7:36 AM
A rare new photograph of Michael Collins found in an attic just in time for the 90th anniversary of his death
Photo by Google Images
Collins’s biographer Tim Pat Coogan told the BBC programme he did not know if Creek’s version of events was accurate, but ‘it could have happened.’
University of Dundee professor Dr John Regan told the BBC that the account ‘complicates things’. He said: “It suggests that the British were there for the opening shots of the Irish Civil War.”
The programme can be heard at: www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01nl67c
10 Comments
See all comments
WoundedKnee | Nov 02, 2012, 12:33 PM EDT
OLonsigh, your comparison with South Carolina is ignorant nonsense. Don´t you know anything about US history?
Report abuse
curtisjohnson | Nov 01, 2012, 05:02 PM EDT
Achieving material concessions from an opponent with an overwhelming military and financial position (not to mention a terror state with no ethics regarding murdering, starving and torturing civilian non-combatants) hardly makes Collins anyone's bitch. Not doubt, however, that Churchill was America's bitch.
Report abuse
anglo-norman | Nov 01, 2012, 12:44 AM EDT
Collins was Churchills bitch
Report abuse
kerry214 | Nov 01, 2012, 12:44 AM EDT
I am really glad Ed Farnan did not write the above article. Because if he did he would have devised a story where he had 1st hand evidence that Barack Obama was the who fired the first shots of the Irish civil war. I am dead serious.
Report abuse
DanOLoingsigh | Oct 31, 2012, 08:39 PM EDT
The pro-Treaty faction had won the Dáil vote, and the election...The Four Courts was the new states 'Fort Sumter' moment...
Report abuse
aloistmartin | Oct 31, 2012, 08:17 PM EDT
Nothing any, Right Wing, Mitigationist, Coalitionist, Bourgeoisie, Patriotist, Muscle Mag enthusiast, would not do; If Push, Came to Shove ?
Report abuse
WoundedKnee | Oct 31, 2012, 02:51 PM EDT
There is a lot of circumstantial evidence that in fact Collins was a shill for the British.
Report abuse
pilib04 | Oct 31, 2012, 11:36 AM EDT
I have read this in Irish history books. What is the big news? It's certainly not revisionist history (per Murph). It's been around since the Civil War. Heck, I can't put my finger on it, but there is either a poem or rebel song that refers to this very situation. Collins was a pragmatist and very critical of the idealists in the anti-Treaty IRA and Sinn Fein.
Report abuse
Murph46 | Oct 31, 2012, 10:36 AM EDT
More revisionist history ,such as seems to be in the US.
Report abuse
- Horse disemboweled and sliced open in horrific.
- Senator Schumer says Irish deserve a separate...
- Irish footballer under investigation after...
- Irish politician refuses to back down on...
- Bill O'Reilly claims the Obama administration...
- Chilling testimony before congressional hearing
- Delphi Lodge takes responsibility for turning...
- Sex addiction on the rise says Dublin Clinic...
- Gerry Adams accuses British government of...
- Enda Kenny rejects Dublin Archbishop's claims...
10 Comments



Report abuse