News


After 13-hour Rand Paul filibuster Irish American John Brennan approved by Senate as CIA head

GOP and Tea Party candidates at odds over candidate and confirmation


Newly appointed head of the CIA, and a Roscommon man, John Brennan
Newly appointed head of the CIA, and a Roscommon man, John Brennan
Photo by Google Images

Guinness PubFinder Ad

After an epic filibuster which Democrats finally voted to end, the Senate confirmed John Brennan to be named as CIA director on Thursday.

In the end Brennan won some GOP support. Thirteen Republicans voted with forty nine Democrats and one independent to give Brennan, President Barack Obama's top counterterrorism adviser, the top post at the nation's spy agency.

According to the Washington Examiner, the confirmation came after the Obama administration stated explicitly there are limits on the president's power to use drones against U.S. terror suspects on American soil.

The confirmation vote was 63-34 and came just hours after Republican Senator Rand Paul’s epic 13 hour filibuster of the nomination to extract the answer from the administration.

Attorney General Eric Holder reportedly sent a one-paragraph letter to Paul, which read: 'It has come to my attention that you have now asked an additional question: 'Does the president have the authority to use a weaponized drone to kill an American not engaged in combat on American soil?" Holder wrote Paul, ‘The answer to that question is no.'

Holder's admission cleared the way for the confirmation.

'We worked very hard on a constitutional question to get an answer from the president,' Paul said after voting against Brennan. 'It may have been a little harder than we wish it had been, but in the end I think it was a good healthy debate for the country to finally get an answer that the Fifth Amendment applies to all Americans.'

Paul's insistence that the Obama administration explain its controversial drone program opened a fault line among Senate Republicans, pitting Paul against Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and military hawks like John McCain or Lindsey Graham.

Paul's filibuster reminded the party that unusual coalitions of libertarians and liberals have sided with each other against defense hawks.

McCain angrily claimed that Paul, through his stance on drones, was unnecessarily making Americans fear that their government poses a danger.

'To somehow allege or infer that the president of the United States is going to kill - somebody - who disagrees with the policies is a stretch of imagination which is, frankly, ridiculous,' McCain said.

Senator Graham expressed his incredulity that Republicans would suddenly criticize President Obama on a policy that President George W. Bush previously enforced.

'People are astonished that President Obama is doing many of the things that President Bush did,' Graham said. 'I'm not astonished. I congratulate him for having the good judgment to understand we're at war. And to my party, I'm a bit disappointed that you no longer apparently think we're at war.'


See more: US president , Irish in US Politics , Irish Democrats , Irish GOP , Irish American
Nster.com


7 Comments

See all comments

I am not a defender of teh drone programme as usual in your igorance you miss the point. Paul was grandstanding and even members of his own party felt he was an idiot. I do exuse your inability to see the big picture. So maybe in future you will ask for clarity( if you fail to understand) It is much better than putting your foot in your mouth.
Sean O'Melbourne, sometimes your ignorance exceeds your arrogance, but not this time. Sen Paul achieved a victory: the Imperial Presidency acknowledged some limits. The Obama regime picked up the ball from the Bush folks and ran further with the "new" technology of death by drone. This is merely a technological version of using a sniper, but it was important to establish that the government faced the same restrictions, just because the drone is remote controlled does not exempt the operators from the rule of law. Basically it's the difference between "can" and "may."
That is the way a filabuster is supposed to be. It is supposed to get EVERYBODY to ask "what is he so mad about?" And then to start discussing the point! What are all the talk shows discussing? Assasination by drone! It worked. All the recent GOP filabusters have been "cockroach filabusters" with the filabustering Senator hiding like a cockroach in some tiny crack between a cabinet and the wall where there is no publicity, no personal pain, no reputation damage, AND no public discussion of the point just a shut down of our government and denial of what most people what to see happen. It took a LIBERTARIAN (the party that combines the beliefs of the extreme left and the extreme right) to bring back old style debate. Thanks Senator Paul!
Woundedbrain calling me a right winger is oxomoronic you fool.
Oh, so seanomel, our rabid right-winger from down under, thinks targeted killings and water boarding are just fine. Because those are some of the issues Rand Paul raised in his speech.
Rand Paul standing alone in the senate telling a story no one wants to here looking like a clown from some "theatre of the absurd" play.Protesting against the inevitable and gaining nothing.
When you get Rand Paul and Patrick Lahey to agree on an important issue, it's something worth considering.
 




Log into IrishCentral with your Facebook account


or sign-in directly

E-Mail:
Password:
 Remember me Forgot my password
Not a member? Register Now!
print this article Print
email this articleE-mail