How, in a nation brimming with crops and surrounded on all sides by teeming seas, could the Irish people have starved in their millions in the middle of the 19th century?
The answer, according to noted Irish historian Tim Pat Coogan, is as unsettling as it is direct.
The biggest contributing factor to the Great Irish Hunger was that because of conquest, Ireland was a dependency with no government of its own between 1845 and 1852. It’s a dangerous and isolating scenario that Coogan suggests may be playing out still.
“As I wrote The Famine Plot I got an increasingly bad feeling. The reason that most of what occurred during the famine happened to the Irish was because we didn’t have a government,” he told the Irish Voice during a phone interview last week, not long after his highly publicized visa battle with the U.S. Embassy in Dublin was settled.
“We’re back to that now. We have lost our sovereignty and are depending on doles from Brussels, the IMF and so on. And we’re back to unemployment, emigration and suicide – and of course, to learned helplessness.”
That last condition, which arises from the long-term legacy of colonization and from the despair of never being able to master your own fate, has characterized so much of the Irish response to political and social challenges since the great hunger, Coogan contends.
For decades now Coogan, 77, one of Ireland’s most prominent historians and the former editor of The Irish Press, has studied the impact and consequences of the Great Hunger on the nation, and his research has now led to his new work The Famine Plot, his hard-hitting exploration of the most traumatic event in Irish history.
Perhaps the first and most remarkable thing about the legacy of the Great Hunger is the silence that immediately followed it. For almost a 100 years Irish historians and Irish officialdom were reluctant to address it because they were leery of its enormous emotive and political power.
Interestingly, Coogan was himself prevented from undertaking his own U.S. book tour to promote The Famine Plot due to being twice refused a visa by the American Embassy in Dublin last month. On his personal website he spoke of his unease over the unprecedented decision.
“Somebody, somewhere it appears did not want me to visit the United States to publicize my book on the Famine. It was suggested to me that some securicrats in the U.S. Embassy had decided to do a good turn for their buddies in the British ‘spookdom’ by blocking my attempts to enter the United States on a book tour,” he said.
If this is true then the Great Hunger (and British officialdom’s response to it) has lost none of its power to unnerve. But how can you really postpone an honest telling of how upward of two million Irish people died without that being an insult to their dignity as people?
“I had been applying fruitlessly for a visa since September but inexplicably had two separate visa waivers turned down and finally after much unhelpful gobbledygook from the U.S. Embassy, had to apply for a non-immigrant visa,” Coogan explains.
At 77, now an undisputed elder statesman, it’s baffling that he could be considered a security risk.
If it turns out to be true that the British exerted political pressure on the U.S. to block or at least postpone Coogan’s book tour, they needn’t have worried. Coogan is at pains to point out it in his book that it was not the British public who were responsible for the Great Hunger.
Instead he lays the blame at British officialdom and the often absentee land owning classes which pursued a reckless or opportunistic course of action that exacerbated or exploited conditions on the ground.
For decades, Coogan contends, both British and Irish historians skirted the question of where to lay blame. He also knows why.
“I used to argue a lot about it because of the revisionist historians. It was as if they wanted us to consider the Famine as a sort of 19th century precursor to the Scarsdale Diet (a low fat, low calorie weight loss diet) and not a famine,” he said.
Eyewitnesses of the period like Earl Gray, the then colonial secretary, were in no doubt where the buck stopped.
“We have a military occupation of Ireland,” he told the House of Lords in March 1846, “but in no other sense can it be said to be governed. It (is) occupied by troops, not governed like England.”
It was apparent to Coogan that this central fact, Britain’s misgoverning of an otherwise ignored and dependent colony, was the lynchpin of the crisis.
“But I found that the angle that’s given in most of the studies, is that academics will try to break it down into those who favor the nationalist cause and those who favor – I’m not quite sure who the other side are meant to be.
“The nationalists have been portrayed as ravening nuts compared with the measure gentlemen who take the Scarsdale approach. It’s a kind of colonial cringe that happens, derived from the fact that most historians until recently were trained in England. They had their eyes on their careers, too, of course.”
The better studies on the Great Hunger have all been written by Irish Americans, Coogan contends, since they are outside the British tenure track loop and don’t have to bow the knee to this kind of shibboleth.
“Christine Kinealy, James Donnelly Junior, Bob Scally – all these guys have written about the Famine in a moving way and are above reproach. They don’t follow a hidebound path.”
Unlike their illustrious predecessors, these Irish American historians don’t give credence to the idea that it didn’t matter that food was exported from Ireland during the Famine. Nor have they shied away from examining the impact and legacy on the people who experienced it and their descendents.
“Two million died. It is two million by the way because modern scholarship shows that the loss to the birth rate was more than just a million. Whole families perished and there’s no records. The fevers were devastating and then there were all the diverted births, of children born on ships or born in America,” Coogan explains.
“We lost through death and emigration three million out of a population of nearly nine. There was a psychological aspect to it too, a condition called learned helplessness where the experience is so overwhelming that you simply accept your fate. That learned helplessness has played itself out in all the decades that have followed.”
It didn’t help that a chorus of high-handed British officials saw the subsequent death of millions of Irish paupers as “God’s lesson” for their supposedly shiftless neighbors, Coogan says.
In The Famine Plot Coogan underlines how a toxic stew of anti-Irish sentiment, amoral economic opportunism and longstanding religious discrimination, led – he maintains – to one of the earliest examples of how an engineered food shortage became a covert policy of ethnic cleansing.
Whether you accept this claim or not, that British officialdom pursued a premeditated policy to let Irish paupers die, or whether you believe that laissez-faire economics and political indifference (which is in some ways worse) led to mass starvations, there’s no question that it’s the darkest chapter in Britain’s colonial past.
Many Irish readers will be familiar with the details of the Irish Famine, the numbers who died, the dangerous voyages on coffin ships in search of relief, and the legacy of that crisis on the Irish diaspora of nearly 80 million people.
But nothing can prepare you for the book’s emotional wallop, as Coogan vividly recreates the hell on earth conditions that our ancestors navigated and then were haunted by after the fact. Their voices, the needless horror they witnessed, have rarely been so passionately expressed.
40 Comments
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Switch to the desktop site to post a comment.johnshiel | Dec 12, 2012, 04:06 PM EST
tory2x: thank you so kindly for noticing my diatribe, and you are very welcome. By the way, have you ever heard the saying, "pigs don't know pigs stink"?
seanomelb | Dec 11, 2012, 06:26 PM EST
When torytory cannot dispute the facts he hides behind the veil of "anglophobia".
curtisjohnson | Dec 10, 2012, 10:38 PM EST
“I also enjoy hearing englishmen describe the Irish hunger, the largest European social calamity of the 19th century, as an 'ethnic grudge.'” The irony being that, as demonstrated by, inter alia, the London Times articles during the famine, the english continued to hold an “ethnic grudge” against the Irish even after enslaving them, robbing all of their property (down to deforesting the island), outlawing ownership, forcing tithes to an alien “church,” and, incredibly, creating a class of felony for educating one’s children (this last one was a nice payback considering, in Spenser’s words, “the Saxons of England are said to have their letters and learning, and learned men, from the Irish). This does not even touch the surface of the centuries of atrocities such as half hangings, pitch and cap, crop burning, etc. It seems that no level of criminal activity can satiate their innate degeneracy.
olovely | Dec 10, 2012, 07:03 PM EST
I also enjoy hearing Englishmen describe the Irish hunger, the largest European social calamity of the 19th century, as an 'ethnic grudge.'
olovely | Dec 10, 2012, 07:00 PM EST
I always enjoy listening to Englishmen like ToryTory calmly inform us of what the Irish are thinking.
phinsman | Dec 10, 2012, 03:57 PM EST
I am not 100% certain about this, but I am guessing that my Irish ancestors migrated to the US during the potato famine. They all came here during the first half of 1800s. I have four connections back to Ireland from the 1800s: O'Neill, Harney, McKenna and Anderson (Scots Irish). I feel so fortunate that they were able to make it to the United States, otherwise I would probably not exist.
ToryTory | Dec 10, 2012, 03:15 PM EST
Thanks Johnshiel for that banal and oh-so-typical Anglophobic diatribe.
ToryTory | Dec 10, 2012, 02:59 PM EST
I'm not being peremptory, but to suppose the psyche of an entire nation is predicated on some ethnic grudge is moronic beyond belief.
johnshiel | Dec 10, 2012, 11:27 AM EST
Enemy ownership of the land and control of the laws was in full exercise in the 1700's, before the Act of Union and the dissolution of an elected Irish gov't in Dublin. Weren't the Penal Laws at their zenith in the late 1700's? The arrogance and ugliness of English imperialism is to blame. "We deserve your lands and your dehumanization because, well, we're English!"
olovely | Dec 10, 2012, 08:06 AM EST
Trust an Englishman to tell you what the Irish are thinking. Or to deliver a timeline that informs them how and when they must put the past behind them like ToryTory just did. They have always been so insightful in this regard.
IrelandNorth | Dec 10, 2012, 07:07 AM EST
Steady on the melodrama, Cahir! They didn't starve in their millions (ie pl). Only approx one million (ie sing) starved. The Act of Union, 1800-1922 abolished Grattan's [Protestant Landed Gentry] Parliament in Dublin, with a little help of British bribes and peerages. It called protectionism, or nobbling a competitor. The great contemporary employment hunger and its consequent emigrant haemorrhage is in part caused by aficionados of neo-Trevalyanism amongst a native home grown ruling class - in thraldom to their former colonial paymasters. Redcoats have been replaced by greenjackets. The Lisbon Treaty was the new act of union. And debt entrapment is the new imperialsm! Hunger strikes in modern Irish history are quite probably unconscious repetition compulsions of the The Great Starvation. Since partial independence, partitionist party mode has been identification with the aggressor. TDs who draw down on over generous expense accounts whilst having real estate portfolios in excess of 40 properties may be overcompensating for a Famine syndrome. Or they just be plaiin greedy? (How many bags of spuds do you need in the attic to overprovision?) And just as those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it, so too are those who prevailed in any given struggle in a position to revise it, ie the establishment. PS The potatoe blight didn't just affect Ireland, (or parts of Scotland, Wales or England). It also impacted the mainland!
curtisjohnson | Dec 09, 2012, 10:10 PM EST
"The past is in the past..." Is that the reason for the continuing displays of loyalist triumphalism every 12th? Is this why they cannot accept democratically elected Sinn Fein in government?
seanomelb | Dec 09, 2012, 08:31 PM EST
Mainland brits are more like the Irish than you ever care to know get it right torytory
anglo-norman | Dec 09, 2012, 06:09 PM EST
The past is in the past...
KevinKehoe | Dec 09, 2012, 04:34 PM EST
Tory brit, and you claim to know the thinking of the contemporary Irish.
curtisjohnson | Dec 09, 2012, 04:15 PM EST
I assume you have read the book, ToryTory? Based upon the nearest contemporary source, Gildas, there was an ethnic cleansing of the indigenous britons by the anglo-saxons. This is consistent with the genetic evidence, which establishes Offa's Dyke as a type of genetic/geographic barrier.
olovely | Dec 09, 2012, 04:13 PM EST
How dare the Irish feel aggrieved by the death of two million people and the decimation of the nation through starvation, disease and emigration. ToryTory you tell them! They should stop 'emoting' over such catastrophic losses and takes their lumps. Britain had an empire to run and need not have concerned itself with a shiftless dependency full of good for nothing Micks. Does that about cover it?
ToryTory | Dec 09, 2012, 03:16 PM EST
PhlutiePhan - typical 'Irish' American imbecile. Put aside your vapid ethnic grudge; stop feigning to vicariously 'feel' your ancestor's 'pain'. Such trite from these 'Irish' Americans write. The contemporary Irish are more like mainland Britons than you could ever care to know.
ToryTory | Dec 09, 2012, 03:14 PM EST
CitizenWhy - you're uneasy with the term 'genocide' because the event fails every meaningful criteria of that emotively charged statement. The famine has been done to death by other historians - this is just a polemic.
ToryTory | Dec 09, 2012, 03:11 PM EST
What a farce. Coogan has penned a discursive exegesis on the famine, he's written a political polemic. This guy is a popular historian, nothing more, nothing less; he hasn't contributed anything new to the corpus of Irish history, barring of course his ludicrous claim that the famine was orchestrated 'genocide'. What a joke.
PhlutiePhan | Dec 08, 2012, 11:25 PM EST
@slainte9: very interesting comment.
PhlutiePhan | Dec 08, 2012, 11:22 PM EST
Couldn't figure out what force was after him and it appeared to be nothing more than "Coogan's Bluff". Now, the truth is there. It is because of this book on "The Great Famine". As an Irish-American on the side of my mother, I know all about the trampling of the Irish through my third grade educated grandmother. Her name was Breslin and her uncle changed the name to Brice because he killed a Black-and-Tan. The Brits had been subjugated by the Romans and their cruelty evolved into suppression of the Irish and the use of them as serfs with no rights.
curtisjohnson | Dec 08, 2012, 09:58 PM EST
"Extremes" as in torturing and sexually abusing prisoners who were not convicted of any crimes? Opening up on unarmed protesters with automatic weapons? Colluding in the assassination of civil rights attorneys?
anglo-norman | Dec 08, 2012, 07:12 PM EST
Stop going to extremes curtis like a good man..
curtisjohnson | Dec 08, 2012, 06:37 PM EST
" I think some here are over-reacting by getting too emotional." British patriotards get hysterical about the IRA and they are choir boys in comparison to the worldwide atrocities of the british terror state.
anglo-norman | Dec 08, 2012, 05:54 PM EST
I think some here are over-reacting by getting too emotional. Keep an objective critical eye on all this please..
KevinKehoe | Dec 08, 2012, 04:44 PM EST
They Haven't Left you Know ? In my family’s case they confiscated more than farm equipment & seeds, they took the lot. Farmhouse and 100 acres in Glenogue and cast my great,great grandparents on the side of the road with there 10 children in 1875. One George F Brooke took possession of there homestead along with many others on a beautiful hillside over looking Coolgreany Co. Wexford. Brooke was protected by the :Coercion Act” introduced by the Chief Secretary for Ireland Arthur Balfour. As you may know the people of Palestine are suffering to this day from the Zionist Balfour,s dirty deeds “ the Balfour Declaration” The palestinians are suffering a modern version of what our people went through. The Brooke’s were and still are members of Masonic Order of the Grand Lodge of Ireland. One of his descendants Raymond F Brooke was “Most Worshipful Brother” Grand Master from 1948 to 1964 and Governor of Bank of Ireland. History is repeating itself my friends, here in Ireland the banks are repossessing farms, homes and business across Ireland, nice assets for the “Most Worshipful Brothers” What’s the bets that Kenny & Gilmore are the “ Most Treacherous Brothers”.
seanomelb | Dec 08, 2012, 04:42 PM EST
TPC"s grip on history is commendable cannot wait to read his book on the famine. He's has put into words and pointed the finger at those responible and they are still embarrrassed at what they had done.
CitizenWhy | Dec 08, 2012, 04:32 PM EST
I am uneasy with the term genocide. Britain acted on an economic theory similar to that of Paul Ryan, exonerating government for any obligation to the poor and the distressed in favor of limited government and policies that ensured the privileges of the propertied classes no matter what the cost to other classes. There was no systematic effort to kill the Irish Catholics, as there was was in Turkey to kill Armenian Christians in Turkey and in Nazi Germany. to kill all the Jews. As in the Scottish clearances, immigration and forced exile were the preferred solutions. Those clearances too were economic in motivation, the lairds desiring to maximize profits by replacing people with sheep, a motivation not too different from employers in the USA. Those in the British government who favored public relief for the starving Irish at first insisted that there could be no relief until "Irish Property" (large landlords) were made to pay for the relief since it was they who caused the problem. There were many Irish Catholics who, although tenant farmers, were on permanently renewable 99 year leases, paid their rents in cash, kept the value of the improvements they made to their farms, and accumulated capital over generations. And there were many reports of "learned helplessness" where whole villages starved with the barns in the area stuffed with cash crops - wheat (corn), oats, etc. Many of the poor tenants did not know how to convert these grains into food, but many others must have refrained from taking the available food due to fear or learned helplessness.
Seanmor | Dec 08, 2012, 04:23 PM EST
Nowhere in the article or comments is there any mention of the types of ethnic cleansuing that occured in Ireland in the early 1970s. At lest 3such events happened in the northern part of the country, the worst beinh in erry in late January 1972, when 13 Civil Rights marchers were shot dead by British soldiers. About 5 months prior to that, 9 Nationalists were killed by the Brits in Ballymurphy on the 2nd weekend of August, 1971. Then in early July of '72, 5 innocent civilians were gunned down in the Ballymurphy area. The dead included a Catholic priest and 3 children, the youngest of whom was a 13-year old girl. Some would probably consider these killings ethnic cleansing, but hard core Partitionists regars Belfast and Derry as British cities.
Stiofain | Dec 08, 2012, 04:04 PM EST
I wonder what Dev would have done? Slante9 & Portia777 good points.
CitizenWhy | Dec 08, 2012, 03:23 PM EST
slainte9, I wasn't aware that the British, tn the early 20th century, would confiscate the farm equipment and seeds of a rebel's grandfather. My father and uncles were known rebels and their farms equipment was not confiscated. But then again, British patrols were afraid to penetrate to my father's farm and they did burn down houses on my mother's farm three times before fleeing back. Her farm used three houses because the here 20 kids living on the farm (some by adoption from dead relatives).
Cristoir | Dec 08, 2012, 03:22 PM EST
Coogan provides abundant documentation of the genocidal intentions of the British gov't of the day; but he also bolsters the cover-up by blaming lack of charity instead of focusing on the direct cause of genocide; the Food Removal Sixty-nine of Britain's then-empire army of 137 regiments participated in that at-gunpoint removal of Ireland's food to its ports for export. Coogan's book has done much good, crediting John Mitchel, and taking the penultimate step toward complete truth. To learn which regiment starved your relatives see my irishholocaustdotorg and click on its map until its legiblity is maximized. It has been in circulation since 1995 or 1996.
CitizenWhy | Dec 08, 2012, 03:14 PM EST
How is it that so many families are homeless in the USA when a huge numbers of homes lie empty?
pilib04 | Dec 08, 2012, 01:05 PM EST
It has been a while since I read this quote: "This (the famine) is the final solution to the Irish problem." The statement was made by either Randolph Churhill (Winston's father) or Winston's grandfather. I would be quite appreciative if someone could give me the source for this quote or if you have read something similar.
cillowen | Dec 08, 2012, 12:17 PM EST
for all of ireland's contribution in creating the usa isn't it sad. Marching for over 253 years and fighting irish nonsense - who knew?
slainte9 | Dec 08, 2012, 10:36 AM EST
The ethnic cleansing of Irealand was presaged by the Highland Clearances in Scotland. The demographic reality was that, with Catholic Celts making up nearly half of the the population of the British Isles, the demographic "imbalance" had to be changed to favor Protestant Anglo Saxons... and it was. With the Highland Clearances, colonization of Northern and Eastern Ireland, the Penal Laws, marginalizing the Catholic peasantry, letting the Celts starve off whenever possible and the Cromwellian genocide, featuring starvation, being the major tactics for establishing Anglo-Saxon hegemony. During the Irish insurrection in the early 20th century when they believed his son was a rebel, the British confiscated my great-grandfather's farm equipment and seed stock.
Portia777 | Dec 08, 2012, 10:15 AM EST
It was a genocide in the same manner as the American genocide of the native peoples. Identical to "to hell r connaght" times in Eire.Tim could even go back to the forgotten- deliberate of course- of the Irish slaves, rounded up and families split up- sold to British Colonies. It is just history repeating itself over and over even up to today. The Celtic Tiger - boom and then bust is a deliberate creation - it is a tactic used by grromers in fact- build you up and then pull you right down with a bang- causing serious mental torture- and oh these elite know how the mind works- then you bond with your abuser as in Stockholm syndrome because as Tim points out- learned helplessness and despair. So let us stop blaming those who commit suicide and place the blame where it belongs. 2012- there is no shortage of money in Ireland- money is paper- created out of thin air and made "legal" by elite. Dakota managed to set up its own peoples bank with plenty of money for its people and they did not loose their farms or property and kept the vultures out. So why cant we do similar? Oh Enda and Co know the solution- it was given to them last year- so there is no excuse for history to repeat and all peoples can get off the wheel. Let us Irish show the way.
JimmieM | Dec 08, 2012, 08:57 AM EST
this is the core of current government thinking..."if you ignore history then it didn't happen"...and the best thing about that is then you can use it on the ignorant...tell them any story that suits you..... most people seem to enjoy this kind of ignorance...
WoundedKnee | Dec 08, 2012, 07:46 AM EST
Coogan's essential thesis is correct. The reason the Famine dragged on for years is that it was backed up by British military force. A native Irish government would not have had the resources to put down the disorders that would have erupted (and they would have been much sooner, and more severe, because the people wouldn't have feared it as they feared the British state). An Irish government would have fallen in revolution--remember that 1848 was a year of revolutions throughout Europe. Anyone wanting an analysis form this perspective should read Mitchel's Jail Journal.