Bill O'Reilly says Jennifer Aniston is destroying America
Professional crank yanker Bill O'Reilly has a new enemy: Jen Aniston.
Published Wednesday, August 11, 2010, 11:21 AM
Updated Thursday, August 12, 2010, 7:20 AM
38 comments
Return to article
Next
Page 1 of 3 pages
RobbCobb | Sep 12, 2010, 03:20 PM EDT
Big deal - Bill isn't exactly father type material, but Jen certainly has some "O" factor hotness. Candace Bergen said the same stuff back in the 90's when she was playing "Murphy Brown" and it started all kinds of debate. Dan Quale, vice president at the time, became a media ass hat (more so than he was already) for chiming in on this one. Usually traditional families are great and some studies have been done that show kids benefit from having both a mom and dad at home, but enough studies have been done, and incedence have occured that show just because a man is present, doesn't mean it's going to be an idealic home for children.
Report abuse
maloney | Sep 07, 2010, 09:35 PM EDT
Jen can't keep a man. Hmm Not good enough in bed to keep a man.
Report abuse
Christisall | Aug 20, 2010, 09:49 AM EDT
Taranoconnor has got it right.
Report abuse
Christisall | Aug 20, 2010, 09:48 AM EDT
Yes. Monsoonman, and that is what is wrong with America.
Report abuse
Christisall | Aug 20, 2010, 09:46 AM EDT
to jaynetelane: the answer is that God gave eachof us free will and you exercised yours. God may have willed you to make this decision because He may have known that youa lone would love this child.
Report abuse
Christisall | Aug 20, 2010, 09:45 AM EDT
I think Jen aniston is a ditz. O'Reilly's got it right!
Report abuse
janetelayne | Aug 15, 2010, 10:46 AM EDT
On 4/18/1982 while pursuing a film career in Hollywood, I became a Born-again Christian which was and remains the best decision of my life. I was age 33, the same age as my Lord & Savior when He began His ministry. Yet unlike Him, I had every hope of being married and having my own natural children. But evidently He had other plans for me that did not include marriage but did include motherhood. When I was 44, He brought into my life a very damaged four year old child that nobody wanted except me. My son is now 22 years old and I raised him without a man in my life other than the men at my church who mentored him. At age 60, He brought another damaged four year old into my life. My daughter is now six and I am still single. Is this how I thought my life would go? No! I wanted my own husband and natural children. So, my question is, if Father God only wants women with husbands to have children, then how do you explain my situation? If I had said no to these two precious children God has given me, I would have missed out on the tremendous blessings I have received from being their mother. Has it been easy for me to raise children alone? No, it has not and I certainly do not have the finances movie stars have, but God has always provided. My son tells me all the time that I saved his life.
Report abuse
Laura Wilson | Aug 14, 2010, 09:28 PM EDT
NOT thats a dam lie, I raised 2 kids with child support for only 1, *( dead beat dads ) is the epidemic, all that the new so called dads of today think about is (Them selves)* & x-box & MAN CAVES to play it in can we say GROW the hell up!!! just more proof WOMEN CAN & DO IT ALL . dont have when we have had enough and you are being replaced by sperm banks they dont make messes & leave the toilet seats up & dirty, and leave dirty sox ALL over the place and OOOH so much more You go Jennifer
Report abuse
Monsoonman | Aug 14, 2010, 09:21 PM EDT
The single mom in America has the government as the father to these children.
Report abuse
ganjadec | Aug 14, 2010, 11:06 AM EDT
Maybe a woman doesn't need a man to have a child. But she sure as hell needs one to bring him/her up. Stats prove it.
Report abuse
feliciamaisey | Aug 14, 2010, 12:00 AM EDT
What idiosy is this--there is nothing wrong with being a single parent, nor is there anything wrong with a couple parenting their children and in both cases ONLY IF both parents are truly committed to doing what is best for the child--is Bill Idiot condemning Halle Berry too? What Anniston said is that women have options if they don't find the guy, they are not condemned to a life without a child--with all the kids in the world,who need a loving h9me with or without a parent (meaning single parent), she has a point--they would be only to happy to have a mom who'd love them and provide.
Report abuse
TaranOconner | Aug 13, 2010, 02:40 PM EDT
It takes two to raise a 'Balanced' child--A Reliable Dad and a Responsible Mom. Look at the shape the World is in with our Divorce rates, absent fathers and unreliable Mothers. Sorry for the World in general. Confusion, unhappiness and unrealized potential for us as a Society. Loving and Devoted Parents are a Rarity nowadays. What a Shame.
Report abuse
PhlutiePhan | Aug 13, 2010, 02:11 PM EDT
The problem is to define if JA is just "ditzy" or just plain evil. Otherwise, all of the problems with the pedophile priestsin Ireland can be viewed as just a "civil liberties" issue which can be legislated into reality. JA is being called to task for being severely irresponsible. Isn't that what the show "Friends" was really all about, being irresponsible and thinking that it was funny?
Report abuse
DaisysMom | Aug 13, 2010, 01:10 PM EDT
I am sad for those who think men are irrelevant when having and raising a child.
Report abuse
Next
Page 1 of 3 pages
- Good Morning America says Sasha and Malia...
- Sinn Fein deputy leader speaks out against...
- Former church spokesman criticised for using...
- Michelle Obama and daughters trace their...
- President Obama’s visit to North comes at...
- Daily Mail unloads on 'drunken young' Paddys...
- Dating website for ‘homosensible’ Catholic...
- Michelle Obama and daughters visit Glendalough.
- Body of Irish immigrant tossed in medical...
- Massive outpouring of support as $65,000...
38 Comments




Report abuse